The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth Webster, John
Religion
The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth
Webster, John
Witchcraft; Witchcraft -- Early works to 1800
I have premised thus much, because the most of the Authors that have
treated about this knotty and thorny Subject of Witches and Witchcraft,
have been as confused and immethodical as any. For whereas the learned
Orator _Cicero_ tells us, that _omnis discursus à definitione debet
proficisci_; and that it is also true, that what is not aptly and fitly
defined or described, as far as the Subject will admit of, is never
perfectly understood: yet have the most of these Authors (which are
numerous) laid down no perfect description of a Witch or Witchcraft, nor
explained fully what they meant by that name, notion, or conception. And
therefore, lest I become guilty of the same fault, I shall lay down what
the most considerable Authors that have treated of this Subject, do mean
or intend by this word _Witch_, and _Witchcraft_, and shall fully
explain in what notion or sense I either allow or deny them, and their
actions, and that in this order, and in these Particulars following.
[Sidenote: _Lib. 14. method. c. 9._]
[Sidenote: _Ibid. c. 1._]
1. Though an argument taken _à denotatione nominis_ be of little weight
or validity, and that the industrious and sharp-witted person _Galen_
doth seem to make little account of words, that is, in this respect,
when we would only understand the nature of things, yet in another
respect he concludeth thus: “_Verùm qui alterum docere volet quæ ipse
tenet, huic prorsus nominibus propter res uti est opus._” Now the
handling of Controversies is chiefly and principally to inform others,
and teach them the truth, and to discover errours; therefore in this
respect the explication and denotation of words is exceeding profitable
and necessary: and so _Plato in Cratylo_ tells us: “_Nomen itaq; rerum,
substantiam docendi discernendiq; instrumentum est._” And it being a
manifest truth, that words are but the making forth of those notions
that we have of things, and ought to be subjected to things, and not
things to words: if our notions do not agree with the things themselves,
then we have received false _Idola_ or images of them; but if we have
conceived them aright, and do not express them fitly and congruously,
then we shall hardly make others understand us aright, nor can clearly
open unto them the doctrine that we would teach them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account