The Dixie Druggist, May, 1913: A Monthly Publication Issued to the Retail Drug Trade of the South — John Shaqi
The Dixie Druggist, May, 1913: A Monthly Publication Issued to the Retail Drug Trade of the SouthAnonymous
History
The Dixie Druggist, May, 1913: A Monthly Publication Issued to the Retail Drug Trade of the South
Anonymous
Drugstores -- Southern States -- Periodicals; Pharmaceutical industry -- Periodicals
Various medical associations, pharmaceutical associations, and nearly
every journal allied to medicine and the drug trade decried the use
of hand-me-downs. The committee on revision of the N. F. immediately
offered us a number of preparations of varying merit, that were not
even good substitutes for the above, and these I have understood at the
suggestion of some physicians.
Glycerinated Elix. Gentian, if made according to formula, with its
excessive amount of solution of saccharine and its repulsively
excessive amount of acetic ether, would never supplant the preparation
it was intended to take the place of.
Pulv. Acetanilid Comp. is as dangerous a heart depressent as the
nostrum it was supposed to displace.
We were told that Lactopeptine was too expensive to use as a vehicle,
and was worth not a continental medicinally; that Pancreatin and
diastase were destroyed by Pepsin in the presence of an acid; besides,
after the chemists of the A. M. A. were through their analysis, they
found there was so little Pepsin that it was scarcely worth mentioning,
but if the doctor wanted a good pharmaceutical we could supply Pulv.
Pepsin Comp. or Elix. Digestive Comp., either just as good, not quite
so expensive, and certainly would do no more harm. Associations printed
proprietaries and substitutes side by side and launched this matter as
a propaganda of education for the physicians; material that filled no
void, supplied no deficiency and appealed to many only as a means to
increased profit.
That some physicians did prescribe was only because they had more
confidence in the druggists as compounders of the above preparations
than they had in the manufacturers of the nostrum; because they were
friendly enough with the individual druggist to open an opportunity
for a little better profit; because they thought their patients would
be more economically handled; but had the revisionists advanced a few
scientific combinations, elegant pharmaceuticals or easily prepared
chemicals, they would have given the druggist better material for
propaganda work and appealing agents to most physicians. It was,
however, to a certain extent a wasted effort, lacking in conception,
devoid of originality and decidedly wanting in producing lasting
results. So much for some of the contributing causes.
_Now for the effect._ Business conditions have undoubtedly changed.
This applies not only to the drug business, but to every line of trades
or professions.
Our good old friend, the family doctor, has felt the effects of the
surgeon, the specialist, the hospital, the dispensary.
Lawyers, the effect of the title guarantee companies and syndicated law.
The dry goods and notion business has been revolutionized into
department stores.
The horse dealers, horseshoers and carriage builders must feel the
introduction of the motor vehicle.
Laborers have felt the innovation of the steam shovel, etc.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account