ever will have any place in nature: or by forming figures or lines of
crooked directions of motions or things, which most of them have no
place, so the lines no use in nature, other than to serve hypotheses
of imaginary Powers, or courses, which always have been useless, when
any other Powers, though false, have been assigned and received; and
must all finally be useless, when the true Powers are shewn.”
Such passages show that Hutchinson was either grossly incapable of
appreciating Newton's discoveries, or that he wilfully and maliciously
depreciated them. His own attainments might render the first of these
conclusions improbable, and the second would seem still more so upon
considering the upright tenour of his life. But the truth seems to be,
that having constructed a system with great labour, and no little
ability, upon the assumption that the principles of natural philosophy
as well as of our faith, are contained in the scriptures, and that the
true interpretation of scripture depended upon the right understanding
of the Hebrew primitives, which knowledge the apostate Jews had lost,
and he had recovered, his belief in this system had all the
intolerance of fanaticism or supposed infallibility; and those who
strongly contravened it, deserved in his opinion the punishments
appointed in the Mosaic law for idolatry and blasphemy. Newton and
Clarke were in this predicament. Both, in his judgement, attributed so
much to secondary causes,—those Powers which had been the first
objects of idolatry, that he considered their Deity to be nothing more
than the Jupiter of the philosophizing heathens; and he suspects that
their esoteric doctrine resolved itself into Pantheism. Toland indeed
had told him that there was a scheme in progress for leading men
through Pantheism and Atheism, and made him acquainted with all their
designs, divine or diabolical, and political or anarchical! and all
the villanies and forgeries they had committed to accomplish them.
First they sought to make men believe in a God who could not punish,
and then—that there was no God, and Toland was engaged, for pay, in
this scheme of propagandism, “because he had some learning, and more
loose humour than any of them.” The Pantheisticon was written with
this view. Toland was only in part the author, other hands assisted,
and Hutchinson says, he knew “there was a physician, and a patient of
his a divine, who was very serviceable in their respective stations in
prescribing proper doses, even to the very last.” But they “carried
the matter too far,” “they discovered a secret which the world had not
taken notice of, and which it was highly necessary the world should
know.” For “though it be true to a proverb, that a man should not be
hanged for being a fool, they shewed the principles of these men so
plainly, which were to have no superior, to conform to any religion,
laws, oaths, &c., but be bound by none, and the consequences of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account