The Early History of the Colonial Post-Office — John Shaqi
The Early History of the Colonial Post-OfficeWoolley, Mary Emma
History
The Early History of the Colonial Post-Office
Woolley, Mary Emma
Postal service -- United States -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775
[46] The successor of Duncan and famous as the publisher of the _News
Letter_.
[47] _Mass. Historical Collections_, 3d Series, Vol. VII., pp. 60, 69.
Campbell’s memorandum of 1703 (July 19) is interesting as showing the
cost of maintaining the office between Philadelphia and Piscataqua. The
annual outlay was £680, and the receipts little more than £400, leaving
a deficit of £275.
The Campbells had other grievances.[48] In a petition to the governor,
the council and the assembly, soon after the act of 1693, Duncan begged
that a fine be imposed for failure to deliver letters from ships to the
postmaster. In 1694 the request was repeated, and in answer to this
petition a bill was presented ordering all persons not bringing letters
which ought to be delivered into the post office, to pay four times as
much as was due on the letters, damages to be made good to the party
injured. The house voted in the affirmative May 8, 1694/5, but the
council seems to have taken no action in the matter. In 1696 (May 27)
Campbell sent a similar petition, asking also that the rates on foreign
letters might be advanced from two to three pence, and the payment to
masters of ships from an half penny to 1d., “which,” he adds, “will be a
great encouragement to masters not to deliver news to other persons.”
[48] _Mass. Historical Collections_, 3d Series, Vol. VII., pp. 56-60.
In 1703, John Campbell offered a memorial to the general court,
complaining “that every body carrying of letters to and from towns where
post offices are settled, is a very great hindrance and discouragement
to said office,” letters from Connecticut colony being carried to
Piscataqua, and after lying in the office there some weeks and months,
at last come to Boston, the office being blamed for the delay without a
cause, and that one-half the letters from Europe and West Indies and
other places by sea, were not brought to the office at all. The ferrymen
also came in for their share of blame, as being very backward in
carrying those employed in the post office, sometimes even demanding
money for ferriage. The petition was granted (July 22, 1703), and £20
for the year past and £40 for the one ensuing allowed to Campbell. Again
in 1706 (April 12 and October 30) £50 was granted to him. In 1709
(November 18) he wrote to the Governor that six months after his
appointment by Hamilton in 1701, he had represented to the General
Assembly that he could not serve, since the salary was so small, and two
members of the upper house had then suggested a salary of £40, which,
reduced by the vote of the lower house to £20, had been paid until
within three years. He recalled the fact that the post office saved the
country above £150 per annum, which it would be obliged to pay for
express, if there were no office. The public letters, passed free, had
cost more than the postmaster’s allowance, besides the charge of sending
the governor’s letters weekly to Roxbury “in times of snow or rain.” The
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account