The early history of the HebrewsSayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
History
The early history of the Hebrews
Sayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Bible. Old Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.; Jews -- History -- To 953 B.C.
Aaron and his sons, like Moses, were at the outset Levites, and as such
doubtless had no claim to superior sanctity and power. But circumstances
had placed them at the head of their tribe; and when that tribe became
the ministers of the sanctuary, Aaron and his descendants necessarily
occupied the foremost place in its services. They were in a special
sense the guardians of the ark, and thus alone privileged to enter the
Holy of Holies, where Yahveh revealed Himself above the cherubim. As
long as there was but one sanctuary, it was easy to maintain the
distinction between the priest of the house of Aaron and the ordinary
Levite. But with the conquest of Canaan all this was changed.
Sanctuaries were multiplied all over the land; the old high-places
became seats of the worship of Yahveh, and there were rival centres of
religious authority, like that of Baal-berith at Shechem, or that of the
graven image at Dan (Judg. xviii. 14, etc.). Local temples or
tabernacles took the place of the one that was hallowed by the presence
of the ark, and the line of Aaron fell into the background. In the age
of national trouble and disintegration which preceded the accession of
Saul, the character of the high-priestly family itself had much to do
with the loss of its power and influence. Eli, its representative at
Shiloh, was old and feeble, and his sons set at defiance the Mosaic law,
which required that Yahveh’s portion of the sacrifice should be burned
on the altar before the priests received their share, and so they made
‘the offering of the Lord’ to be ‘abhorred.’ The capture of the ark by
the Philistines and the massacre of the priests at Nob by order of Saul
completed the dissolution of the high-priestly authority; and when the
temple at Jerusalem was built under Solomon, a new branch of the family
of Aaron was appointed to minister in it, and his descendants became
little more than hereditary court-chaplains. It has even been doubted
whether there was any high-priest, properly so called, under the kings;
if there were, he had been divested of the power and position which had
been given him by the Levitical law.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account