The early history of the HebrewsSayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
History
The early history of the Hebrews
Sayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Bible. Old Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.; Jews -- History -- To 953 B.C.
The tribe of Judah as a compact and definite whole first makes its
appearance at a later period, and, unlike the other tribes of Israel,
represents a geographical rather than an ethnographical unity.[272] Jews
were commingled in it with Edomites, as well as with other tribes—Dan,
Simeon, and Levi. Its cities were only partly Israelitish; even the
future capital, Jerusalem, retained its Jebusite population, and the
temple was built on land that had been bought from a Gentile owner.
Nevertheless, the fact that both tribe and territory bore to the last
the name of Judah indicates that in this mixture of nationalities the
Hebrew element remained the stronger and more predominant. It is true
that Hebron, the first centre and capital of Judah, had been conquered,
not by a Jew, but by the Kenizzite Caleb, and that his brother Othniel
was the first ‘Judge’; but it is also true that the settlement of the
country was in the main due to an amalgamation of Hebrew and Edomite
elements. Gedor, Socho, Zanoah, Keilah, and Eshtemoa traced their second
foundation to a Kenizzite father and a Jewish mother (1 Chron. iii. 18,
19), and Hebron itself soon ceased to be distinctively Kenizzite and
became Jewish.
Caleb the Kenizzite had been one of the spies sent out from
Kadesh-barnea when the Israelites made their first, and unsuccessful,
attempt to invade Canaan. He consequently belonged to the generation
which had escaped from the bondage of Egypt, of which he and Joshua were
said to have been the only survivors at the time of the passage of the
Jordan. Hebron had been the chief point and goal of exploration on the
part of the spies, and it was from its neighbourhood that the grapes
were brought which testified to the fertility of the land. It was
natural, therefore, that Hebron should again be the object of Caleb’s
aim, and that while the Ephraimitish general was establishing himself in
the north Caleb should lead his followers to its assault. The
destruction of Lachish had opened the way; and the steep path which led
up the limestone hills from Lachish to Hebron was left undefended.
Modern writers have seen in the name of Caleb a mere tribal designation
denoting the ‘Calebites’ or ‘Dog-men.’ But the cuneiform inscriptions
show us that Caleb or ‘Dog’ was the name of an individual, and they also
explain how it came to be so. In the Tel el-Amarna tablets, as well as
in later Assyrian letters, the word _Kalbu_ or ‘Dog’ is used in the
sense of ‘officer’ or ‘messenger’; the king’s officer was his ‘faithful
dog,’ and the term was an honourable one.[273] It conveyed none of those
ideas of contempt or abuse with which it was afterwards associated in
the Semitic mind, and which may have had their origin in Arabia. It is
possible that Caleb had been an ‘officer’ of the Pharaoh before he
became a Hebrew spy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account