The early history of the HebrewsSayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
History
The early history of the Hebrews
Sayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Bible. Old Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.; Jews -- History -- To 953 B.C.
Ingenious Germans have connected with the destruction of Sodom and its
sister cities a passage in the Latin writer Justin (xviii. 3. 2, 3), in
which it is said that the Phœnicians were driven to the Canaanitish
coast by an earthquake which took place in their original home near ‘the
Assyrian lake.’ Instead of ‘Assyrian,’ some manuscripts read ‘Syrian,’
and the lake has accordingly been imagined to be the Dead Sea, and the
earthquake to be the rain of fire which destroyed the cities of the
plain.[41] But there is no other instance in which the Dead Sea is
called ‘the Syrian lake,’ supposing this to be the true reading, nor is
there any trace of an earthquake in the catastrophe described in
Genesis. Moreover, the unanimous voice of classical antiquity declared
that the Phœnicians had come from the Persian Gulf, not from the valley
of the Jordan, and their seafaring propensities were explained by the
fact that they once lived in the islands of the Erythræan Sea. Whatever
the ‘Assyrian lake’ may have been, it was not the ‘Salt Sea’ of the Old
Testament.
The Israelites traced back to Abram the rite of circumcision which they
practised. The rite, however, was not confined to Israel. So far as
Western Asia is concerned, it seems to have been of African origin. It
is to be found among most of the races and tribes of Africa, and in
Egypt the institution was of immemorial antiquity. According to
Herodotos (ii. 36), the Egyptians, the Ethiopians, and the Kolkhians
alone observed it ‘from the beginning,’ the Phœnicians and Syrians of
Palestine having learned it from the Egyptians, and the Cappadocians
from the people of Kolkhis. But the knowledge of the world possessed by
Herodotos was limited, and his anthropology is not profound. The
practice is met with in various parts of the world; it owes its origin
to considerations of chastity, its maintenance to sanitary reasons. It
is true that Africa was peculiarly its home, and that it seems to have
been common to the aboriginal tribes of that continent, but it is also
true that it was known to aboriginal tribes in other parts of the globe
among whom—so far as our evidence can tell us—the practice originated
independently.[42]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account