The early history of the HebrewsSayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
History
The early history of the Hebrews
Sayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Bible. Old Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.; Jews -- History -- To 953 B.C.
See my _Races of the Old Testament_, pp. 127, 132, where a photograph
is given of Professor Flinders Petrie’s cast of the Ashkelon profiles.
Footnote 67:
_Black Obelisk_, lines 60, 61, compared with _Monolith Inscription_,
ll. 90-95.
Footnote 68:
One _feddan_ or acre contained 1800 _sari_ (Reisner in the
_Zeitschrift für Assyriologie_, xi. 4, p. 421). The area was not
great, though it was calculated that not more than 120 _sari_ could be
ploughed by a single ox.
Footnote 69:
Published by Strassmaier in the Transactions of the Fifth Oriental
Congress, ii. 1, _Append._ pp. 14, 15; a translation will be found in
Peiser’s _Altbabylonische Urkunden in the Keilschriftliche
Bibliothek_, iv. p. 7. The tablet was found at Tel-Sifr.
Footnote 70:
Published by Meissner, _Beiträge zum altbabylonischen Privatrecht_,
No. 43 (with corrections by Pinches); a translation is given by
Peiser, _Keilschriftliche Bibliothek_, iv. pp. 23-25.
Footnote 71:
Gen. xxiii. 18. The Hebrew expression ‘In the presence of’ is the same
as that which is translated ‘Witnessed by’ in the Babylonian
documents.
Footnote 72:
Babylonian _shaqâlu kaspa_, Hebrew _shâqal [eth-hak-] keseph_.
Footnote 73:
According to Professor Flinders Petrie, the heavy maneh or mina as
fixed by Dungi and restored by Nebuchadrezzar weighed 978,309 grammes.
An example of it is now in the British Museum. See Lehmann in the
_Verhandlungen der Anthropologischen Gesellschaft_, 1893, p. 27.
Footnote 74:
The identification is, however, doubtful, since only potsherds of the
Roman period are visible at Umm Jerâr, which, moreover, according to
Palmer (_Name-lists_ in the _Survey of Western Palestine_, p. 420), is
merely Umm el-Jerrâr, ‘the mother of water-pots.’
Footnote 75:
Beti-ilu (Winckler’s _Tel el-Amarna Letters_, Nos. 51, 125) is
associated with Tunip and the country of Nukhassê. The reading of the
name is not quite certain, however, as it may be transcribed Batti-ilu
or Mitti-ilu. A Babylonian of the Abrahamic age also has the name of
Beta-ili.
Footnote 76:
The title seems to have been of Horite origin (see Gen. xxxvi. 21, 29,
30).
Footnote 77:
It is noticeable that the Edomite leader who was carried captive to
Egypt by Ramses III. after he had destroyed ‘the tents’ of ‘the Shasu
in Seir,’ is entitled ‘chieftain,’ and not ‘king.’ There is a portrait
of him on the walls of Medînet Habu at Thebes.
Footnote 78:
For another explanation of the name, see Gen. xxv. 26; Hos. xii. 3.
Footnote 79:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account