The introduction of classical learning as well as of Christianity is
popularly ascribed to St. Patrick whose missionary work began 432 A.D.
This opinion though widespread will not stand a critical examination.
It is true, however, that St. Patrick is the first person whose name
is associated with the introduction of classical learning of whom it
can be said that the writings ascribed to him are really his. In the
_Book of Armagh_ (completed c. 806 A.D.) there is a document called
his “Confession,” or apology which was copied by the scribe Torbach
from the original.[32] Although the “Confession” and other writings
attributed to St. Patrick may be admitted as genuine, it must not be
assumed that the learning for which Ireland became famous during the
sixth, seventh and eighth centuries could have been the result of his
labours.[33] Most people who have read St. Patrick’s writings will
admit that he makes no claim to be a scholar but on the contrary he
has a very humble opinion of himself and reminds us frequently of his
ignorance of letters. As Bury says,[34] “His Latin is as ‘rustic’ as
the Greek of St. Mark and St. Matthew,” and Whitley Stokes infers from
his writings that he knew no Greek.[35] In this respect St. Patrick was
no worse than many of his famous contemporaries and successors, for
example—his Latin is no more ‘rustic’ than that of Gregory of Tours
who lived a century later. Indeed St. Patrick’s claim to fame rests on
higher grounds than those of classical scholarship. He was a preacher
and organizer rather than a man of letters. He was a _homo unius libri_
but with that book, the Christian Scriptures, he was extraordinarily
familiar.[36] Yet some writers have attributed the introduction of
learning and even of the Roman alphabet to St. Patrick. It is true that
in the _Tripartite Life_ there are frequent statements that he wrote
_Abgitoria_ (usually translated Alphabets) for his noble or bardic
converts.[37] It is very probable that these do not mean alphabets, as
is usually supposed, like that on the pillar stone of Kilmakedar in
Kerry,[38] but _elementa_, the A B C of the Christian Doctrine. This
explanation seems justified by the words _Abgitir Crabaid_ glossed
_initium fidei_ in a Würzburg MS.[39] In the Tripartite occur the
words, _Aibgitir in Crabaid_—translated the Alphabet of Piety—where
a specimen is given of a work so entitled.[40] For these and other
reasons which will be stated presently the weight of evidence is
against attributing to St. Patrick the introduction of the Roman
alphabet or any liberal measure of classical learning.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account