Such varied activities as copying and glossing the writings of
classical authors, teaching poetry, and writing treatises on grammar
are sufficient to suggest that the literary interests of the Irish
monks extended beyond psalm-singing and a study of the writings of
the Fathers. Even if their primary interest was the study of the
Scriptures this very interest created a need for an abundance of
correct texts. This naturally led to a careful study of orthography
and the production of treatises on grammar in the broad sense in which
we have defined the term. Possibly at first the rudiments of grammar
were all that was necessary, but as Mr. Roger so aptly remarks,[352]
“l’émulation créée par l’expansion du monachisme, la hardiesse et la
curiosité naturelles des Irlandais, le désir d’approcher de plus en
plus la pensée divine en pénétrant le sens d’Écriture, le goût pour
l’étude qui n’était pas une nouveauté en Irlande, les entraînent au
delà de ces éléments.” Thus having surmounted preliminary difficulties
it was but natural that they whose literary taste had been developed by
the study of their vernacular literature should not hesitate to study
the classical authors. There was no fear of the return of paganism;
to the Irish the Greek and Latin deities made no appeal. As they were
not likely to sacrifice their faith to pagan rhetoric there was no
necessity to confine themselves to rustic Latin as was the custom with
the early Christians on the Continent who were daily drawing farther
and farther away from correct classical forms. Hence _a priori_ there
are many reasons why we should expect to find traces of the classics in
the writings of the Irish monks. This view is confirmed by an actual
analysis of the existing works of writers of this period.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account