The Educational Writings of Richard MulcasterMulcaster, Richard
History
The Educational Writings of Richard Mulcaster
Mulcaster, Richard
Education -- History
But why may we not use all our four-and-twenty letters, even for
four-and-twenty uses each, if occasion serve, seeing that the
characters being known are more familiar and easier to be discerned
than any new device--yea, even though the old resembled each other
more, and there were but one new? It has been sufficiently declared
already, that those men who first devised letters, reserved the
authorities over them and their use to themselves for life, and
to their successors for ever, to modify and use them as it should
please them best by consent among themselves, as necessity arose.
And why not so, where the invention is their own, and the right
use of it? This general reservation is enrolled already in all
reason and antiquity, and the particular consent for the writing
of our language is given already by our general use, and will be
registered also in a very good record, I hope, and that shortly.
And will you make that sovereign which is but subaltern? Or will
you take that to be immovable like a steady rock, which roams by
nature, to serve the finder? There is no such assurance in sound
for the establishing of a right as you conceive, nor any such
necessity in letters to be constant in one use as you seek to
enforce.
The philosopher says that nature makes one thing for one use, and
that every use has its particular instrument naturally, but that
our own inventions--nay, that even the most natural means--may
through our application, serve for sundry ends and uses. And will
letters stand so upon their reputation as not to seem to admit of
our applying them to their own purposes, seeing that they are both
our creatures, and by creation our bondmen, both to sound as we
shall think good, and in as many ways as we may wish them to serve?
No, surely, they do not think so, but they are most ready to serve
as we appoint, both by creation and by covenant. The letters yield
readily, but some letters seek to delay their dutiful obedience,
holding that their substance is adamant, and that they were not
born to yield so.
With the same pen we make letters and mar them; with the same we
direct and destroy them; which are contrary uses, though meant to
compass the same right end. And will letters seem to serve but for
one use, being nothing but elves of the pen’s breeding? They will
not, but prove their own dutifulness to the pen, their parent,
by following his direction in very many points, as they yield to
reason and reasonable custom in many of their powers, whereby they
seem to argue against contention, they themselves being satisfied.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account