The Educational Writings of Richard MulcasterMulcaster, Richard
History
The Educational Writings of Richard Mulcaster
Mulcaster, Richard
Education -- History
We are next to consider who are those to whom education should be
given, which I take to be children of both sorts, male and female.
But young maidens must give me leave to speak of boys first,
because naturally the male is more worthy and more important in
the body politic; therefore that side may claim learning as first
framed for their use and most properly belonging to them, though
out of courtesy and kindness they may be content to lend some
advantages of their education in the time of youth to the female
sex on whom they afterwards bestow themselves, and the fruit of
their whole training.
All cannot receive a Learned Education.
As for boys, it has been set beyond doubt long ago, that they
should be sent to school, to learn how to be religious and loving,
how to govern and obey, how to forecast and prevent, how to defend
and assail, and in short, how to perform excellently by labour the
duties for which nature has fitted them only imperfectly. But in
the matter of this so desirable a training, two important questions
arise; first, whether all children should be put to school without
any restraint upon the number, and secondly, if any restriction is
needful, how it is to be imposed. In the body politic a certain
proportion of parts must be preserved just as in the natural body,
or disturbances will arise, and I consider that it is a burden to
a commonwealth on the one hand to have too many learned, just as
it is a loss on the other hand to have too few, and that it is
important to have knowledge and intelligence well adapted to the
station in life, as, if these are misplaced it may lead to disquiet
and sedition.
There is always danger to a State in excess of numbers beyond the
opportunities of useful employment, and this is specially true in
the case of scholars. For they profess learning, that is to say,
the _soul_ of the State, and it is too perilous to have the soul of
the State troubled with _their_ souls, that is, necessary learning
with unnecessary learners. Scholars, by reason of their conceit
which learning inflames, cannot rest satisfied with little, and
by their kind of life they prove too disdainful of labour, unless
necessity makes them trot. If that wit fall to preach which were
fitter for the plough, and he to climb a pulpit who was made to
scale a wall, is not a good carter ill lost, and a good soldier ill
placed?
All children cannot get a full training at school, even though
their private circumstances admit of it, yet as regards writing
and reading, if that were all, what if everyone had them, for the
sake of religion and their necessary affairs? In the long period
of their whole youth, if they minded no more, these two would be
easily learned in their leisure times by special opportunities, if
no ordinary means were available and no school nigh. Every parish
has a minister, who can give help in regard to writing and reading,
if there is no one else.
Choice of Scholars both from Rich and Poor.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account