The Elements of Qualitative Chemical Analysis, vol. 1, parts 1 and 2.: With Special Consideration of the Application of the Laws of Equilibrium and of the Modern Theories of Solution.Stieglitz, Julius
Science
The Elements of Qualitative Chemical Analysis, vol. 1, parts 1 and 2.: With Special Consideration of the Application of the Laws of Equilibrium and of the Modern Theories of Solution.
Stieglitz, Julius
Chemistry, Analytic -- Qualitative
«The Solubility- or Ion-Product Principle.»—We may formulate this
important conclusion by stating, that, ‹in saturated solutions of
silver acetate, the product of the concentrations of its ions has a
constant value at a given temperature›. Analogous relations may be
developed for the saturated solutions of other difficultly soluble
ionogens. The constant has been called the ‹solubility-product
constant› or the ‹ion-product constant› of the ‹ionogen›. For salts
like lead iodide PbI_{2}, silver chromate Ag_{2}CrO_{4}, etc.,
each molecule of which forms more than one of a given ion, the
concentration of such an ion is raised, in the solubility-product,
to the power corresponding to the number of ions of this kind formed
from a single molecule of the electrolyte.[292] Thus, lead iodide
ionizes according to the equation PbI_{2} ⇄ Pb^{2+} + 2 I^{−} and,
for a saturated solution of lead iodide[293] at a given temperature,
[Pb^{2+}] × [I^{−}]^2 = K. For silver chromate, ionizing according to
the equation Ag_{2}CrO_{4} ⇄ 2 Ag^{+} + CrO_{4}^{2−}, the form of the
solubility-product equation is [Ag^{+}]^2 × [CrO_{4}^{2−}] = K. In
general, for a saturated solution of a difficultly soluble salt at a
given temperature ‹the product of the ion concentrations, each raised
to the power corresponding to the number of that kind of ion formed
from the ionization of one molecule of the salt, is a constant›.
«Criticism of the Derivation of the Principle.»—Nernst developed this
important relation in 1889, shortly after the theory of ionization
was formulated. Since then, however, the soundness of the theoretical
development, on which it was based, has been rendered open to
question in a way that could hardly have been foreseen at that
early stage in the development of the theory of ionization. In the
first place, it is known now that the ionization of easily ionizing
substances (strong electrolytes) does [p142] not conform to the
law of chemical equilibrium (‹vide› p. 108); as far as our present
knowledge goes, the ratio in equation I is not a constant, but grows
‹larger› with an increasing total concentration of good electrolytes.
In the present case, this total concentration may be increased by the
introduction of ‹foreign salts›.[294] In the second place, the second
fundamental principle used, the principle of the constant solubility
of the dissolved molecular or non-ionized salt, as expressed in
equation III, was questioned and disproved by Arrhenius in 1899. The
molecular solubility depends on the total concentration of salts in
the solution and, in general, decreases with increasing concentration
of the total dissolved salts. This result does not invalidate the law
of physical equilibrium; it merely means that the presence of salts,
especially in appreciable quantities, modifies the nature of the
solvent and changes its dissolving power, much as we have different
dissolving power shown by different pure solvents, such as water and
alcohol.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account