The Elements of Qualitative Chemical Analysis, vol. 1, parts 1 and 2.: With Special Consideration of the Application of the Laws of Equilibrium and of the Modern Theories of Solution.Stieglitz, Julius
Science
The Elements of Qualitative Chemical Analysis, vol. 1, parts 1 and 2.: With Special Consideration of the Application of the Laws of Equilibrium and of the Modern Theories of Solution.
Stieglitz, Julius
Chemistry, Analytic -- Qualitative
EXP. If a bulb containing a few drops of bromine is broken at the
bottom of a tall cylinder, the bromine vapor is seen to diffuse
rather slowly into the upper part of the cylinder, the bromine
molecules, in their passage upward, rebounding from the air
molecules, with which the cylinder is filled. If a second cylinder
is first evacuated, and the bromine bulb is broken ‹in vacuo›, the
vapor is seen to fill the cylinder instantly, the high velocity of
the bromine molecules being thus revealed.
But a third question, of fundamental importance in the comparison
of the condition of a substance existing as a gas and its condition
in a solution of the same concentration and temperature, results
from a consideration of the ‹frequency of the impacts› of the solute
molecules against the solvent, growing out of the reduction of the
lengths of the mean free paths of the solute molecules.[41] In order
to be able to take this fact properly into account, it will be
necessary to consider somewhat more precisely the manner in which,
according to the kinetic theory, gas pressure is produced.
We may consider that we have in a cube of unit volume (1 c.c.) ‹n›
molecules of a gas, each of mass ‹m› and average velocity ‹u› cm. per
second. We may assume that one-third of the total number [p030] of
molecules moves in each of the three dimensional directions.[42] A
single molecule of mass ‹m›, striking the surface with a velocity ‹u›
and rebounding with the same velocity in the opposite direction, will
exert on the surface a force of 2 ‹m› ‹u› units. But, with a velocity
of ‹u› cm. per second, it will reach the opposite wall and return
to the surface we are considering, ‹u› / 2 times in one second. A
single molecule will consequently exert a force 2 ‹m› ‹u› × ‹u› / 2
or ‹m› ‹u›^2 on the surface, and the ‹n› / 3 molecules moving in the
same direction will exert a force ‹n› / 3 × ‹m› ‹u›^2 on the unit
surface. This represents, therefore, the pressure of such a gas, as
calculated on the basis of the assumptions of the kinetic theory.
Now, when a gas is so strongly compressed, that the bulk of the
molecules is not negligible in comparison with the total volume of
the gas, the number of impacts on unit surface in unit time becomes
sensibly greater than ‹n› / 3 × ‹u› / 2, since the distance to be
covered between successive blows on the surface will be sensibly
less than 2 cm., in a cube of unit volume. If we imagine, for the
sake of a rough illustration, that one-third of the molecules in 1
c.c. are united into one spherical mass (indicated by A in Fig. 7),
moving upwards and downwards, it is obvious that the distance covered
between two successive blows on a surface is not 2 cm., but that
distance diminished by twice the diameter of the sphere. For strongly
compressed gases, the total number of impacts on unit surface is
therefore sensibly greater than ‹n› / 3 × ‹u› / 2, and the pressure
is proportionately greater. According to van der Waal's correction
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account