s. 405. _Drank, drunk, drunken._--With all words wherein the vowel of the
plural differs from that of the singular, the participle takes the plural
form. To say _I have drunk_, is to use an ambiguous expression; since
_drunk_ may be either a participle _minus_ its termination, or a praeterite
with a participial sense. To say _I have drank_, is to use a praeterite for
a participle. To say _I have drunken_, is to use an unexceptionable form.
In all words with a double form, as _spake_ and _spoke_, _brake_ and
_broke_, _clave_ and _clove_, the participle follows the form in _o_, as
_spoken_, _broken_, _cloven_. _Spaken_, _braken_, _claven_, are impossible
forms. There are degrees in laxity of language, and to say _the spear is
broke_ is better than to say _the spear is brake_.
These two statements bear upon the future history of the praeterite. That
of the two forms _sang_ and _sung_, one will, in the course of language,
become obsolete is nearly certain; and, as the plural form is also that of
the participle, it is the plural form which is most likely to be the
surviving one. {352}
s. 406. As a general rule, we find the participle in _-en_ wherever the
praeterite is strong; indeed, the participle in _-en_ may be called the
strong participle, or the participle of the strong conjugation. Still the
two forms do not always coincide. In _mow_, _mowed_, _mown_; _sow_,
_sowed_, _sown_; and several other words, we find the participle strong,
and the praeterite weak. I remember no instances of the converse. This is
only another way of saying that the praeterite has a greater tendency to
pass from strong to weak than the participle.
s. 407. In the Latin language the change from _s_ to _r_, and _vice
vers[^a]_, is very common. We have the double forms _arbor_ and _arbos_,
_honor_ and _honos_, &c. Of this change we have a few specimens in English.
The words _rear_ and _raise_, as compared with each other, are examples. In
Anglo-Saxon a few words undergo a similar change in the plural number of
the strong praeterites.
Ce['o]se, _I choose_; ce['a]s, _I chose_; curon, _we chose_; gecoren,
_chosen_.
Forle['o]se, _I lose_; forle['a]s, _I lost_; forluron, _we lost_;
forloren, _lost_.
Hreose, _I rush_; hre['a]s, _I rushed_; hruron, _we rushed_; gehroren,
_rushed_.
This accounts for the participial form _forlorn_, or _lost_, in New High
German _verloren_. In Milton's lines,
---- the piercing air
Burns _frore_, and cold performs the effect of fire.
_Paradise Lost_, b. ii.
we have a form from the Anglo-Saxon participle _gefroren_=_frozen_.
s. 408. The participle in _-d_, _-t_, or _-ed_.--In the Anglo-Saxon this
participle was declined like the adjective. Like the adjective, it is, in
the present English, undeclined.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account