The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 01 (of 11)Hobbes, Thomas
Philosophy
The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 01 (of 11)
Hobbes, Thomas
Philosophy, English -- 17th century
Fourthly, I would not have any man think I deliver the forms above for a
true and exact ordination of names; for this cannot be performed as long
as philosophy remains imperfect; nor that by placing (for example)
_light_ in the predicament of _qualities_, while another places the same
in the predicament of bodies, I pretend that either of us ought for this
to be drawn from his opinion; for this is to be done only by arguments
and ratiocination, and not by disposing of words into _classes_.
Lastly, I confess I have not yet seen any great use of the predicaments
in philosophy. I believe _Aristotle_ when he saw he could not digest the
things themselves into such orders, might nevertheless desire out of his
own authority to reduce words to such forms, as I have done; but I do it
only for this end, that it may be understood what this ordination of
words is, and not to have it received for true, till it be demonstrated
by good reason to be so.
-------
CHAPTER III.
OF PROPOSITION.
1. Divers kinds of speech.—2. Proposition defined.—3. Subject,
predicate, and copula, what they are; and abstract and concrete
what. 4. The use and abuse of names abstract.—5. Proposition,
universal and particular.—6. Affirmative and negative.—7. True and
false.—8. True and false belongs to speech, and not to things.—9.
Proposition, primary, not primary, definition, axiom, petition.—10.
Proposition, necessary and contingent.—11. Categorical and
hypothetical.—12. The same proposition diversely pronounced.—13.
Propositions that may be reduced to the same categorical
proposition, are equipollent.—14. Universal propositions converted
by contradictory names, are equipollent.—15. Negative propositions
are the same, whether negation be before or after the copula.—16.
Particular propositions simply converted, are equipollent.—17. What
are subaltern, contrary, subcontrary, and contradictory
propositions.—18. Consequence, what it is.—19. Falsity cannot follow
from truth.—20. How one proposition is the cause of another.
[Sidenote: Divers kinds of speech.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account