The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 01 (of 11) — John Shaqi
The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 01 (of 11)Hobbes, Thomas
Philosophy
The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 01 (of 11)
Hobbes, Thomas
Philosophy, English -- 17th century
1. From the connexion or contexture of names arise divers kinds of
speech, whereof some signify the desires and affections of men; such
are, first, _interrogations_, which denote the desire of knowing: as,
_Who is a good man?_ In which speech there is one name expressed, and
another desired and expected from him of whom we ask the same. Then
_prayers_, which signify the desire of having something; _promises_,
_threats_, _wishes_, _commands_, _complaints_, and other significations
of other affections. Speech may also be absurd and insignificant; as
when there is a succession of words, to which there can be no succession
of thoughts in mind to answer them; and this happens often to such, as,
understanding nothing in some subtle matter, do, nevertheless, to make
others believe they understand, speak of the same incoherently; for the
connection of incoherent words, though it want the end of speech (which
is signification) yet it is speech; and is used by writers of
_metaphysics_ almost as frequently as speech significative. In
philosophy, there is but one kind of speech useful, which some call in
Latin _dictum_, others _enuntiatum et pronunciatum_; but most men call
it _proposition_, and is the speech of those that affirm or deny, and
expresseth truth or falsity.
[Sidenote: Proposition defined.]
2. _A_ PROPOSITION _is a speech consisting of two names copulated, by
which he that speaketh signifies he conceives the latter name to be the
name of the same thing whereof the former is the name; or_ (which is all
one) _that the former name is comprehended by the latter_. For example,
this speech, _man is a living creature_, in which two names are
copulated by the verb _is_, is a _proposition_, for this reason, that he
that speaks it conceives both _living creature_ and _man_ to be names of
the same thing, or that the former name, _man_, is comprehended by the
latter name, _living creature_. Now the former name is commonly called
the _subject_, or _antecedent_, or the _contained name_, and the latter
_predicate_, _consequent_, or _containing name_. The sign of connection
amongst most nations is either some word, as the word _is_ in the
proposition _man is a living creature_, or some case or termination of a
word, as in this proposition, _man walketh_ (which is equivalent to
this, _man is walking_); the termination by which it is said he
_walketh_, rather than he _is walking_, signifieth that those two are
understood to be copulated, or to be names of the same thing.
But there are, or certainly may be, some nations that have no word which
answers to our verb _is_, who nevertheless form propositions by the
position only of one name after another, as if instead of _man is a
living creature_, it should be said _man a living creature_; for the
very order of the names may sufficiently show their connection; and they
are as apt and useful in philosophy, as if they were copulated by the
verb _is_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account