The epistle of Othea to Hector; or, The boke of knyghthodeChristine, de Pisan
Philosophy
The epistle of Othea to Hector; or, The boke of knyghthode
Christine, de Pisan
Fastolf, John, 1378?-1459; French poetry -- To 1500 -- Translations into English
Juno, whom he shulde not sette myche by, þe which is takyn for ryches,
we may vnderstond þerby þat þe good spyrit shulde disprayse ryches. And
Seynt Bernard seith, “O son off Adam, leue couetyse. Wherefor louest
thou so mych this worldly ryches, the which be neythir trwe ne thei be
not yowres, and, wheþþer ye will or non, at yowre dethe ye most nedis
leue theyme?” And the Gospell seyth þat a chamelle shuld souner passe
throwe an nedelles ye than a riche man shuld entre into the kynddom of
heuen; for a chamel hath but oo boche on the bake[317] and the evyl
ryche man hath .ii^o., on of evill possessions and þe tothir of synnes.
He most nedis leue the fryst boche at the dethe, but þe tothir, wheythir
he will or non, he shall bere with hym, if he leue it not afore or that
he dye. To this purpose oure Lord seith in þe Gospell, [“Facilius est
camelum per foramen acus transire quam divitem intrare in regnum
cœlorum”].[318]
L.
Ayens Amphoras[319] sad counsell, I þe sey,
Go not to distrye, for than thou shalt dye,
To Thebes, ne in the cete of Arges
Assemble not host with chelde ne targes.
Amphoras was a full wyse clerk of the cete of Arges and hade myche
connyng, and, when kyng Adrastus wolde go oppon Thebes for to distrye
the cyte, Amphoras, þe which by kunnyng knewe what harme myth fall
þerof, counseld the kyng not to goo, for, yf he wente, thei all shulde
be dede a[n]d dystroyed; but he was not beleuyd. Yit it felle as he
seyde. Wherefor it is seide to the good knyght þat ayens the counsell of
wyse men he shulde take no grete enterpryse. But as Soleyne[320] seith,
“The wyse manes counsell vayleth lytell to hym þat wyl not do
therafter.”
Be Amphoras counsel, ayens the which non shulde goo to bateyle, we may
take that the goode sperit shuld folowe holy prechyngges. And Seynte
Gregorie seyth in his Omelies þat, lech as the lyffe of the body may
notte be susteyned withowte that he take his refeccion bodyly, on the
same wyse þe lyfe of the soule may not be [Sidenote: f. 36] susteined
withowte ofte heryng the good worde of God.[321] Than Godes wordes the
which ye here[322] with youre bodely heris reseyue them in yowre hertis;
for, whan the word is hed and kepte in yowre wombe of mynde, than it may
profyte, but, as a seke stomak castyth owt his mete, and as men be in
dispayre of hym that brokyth notte but casti[t]h all owte, euen so his
he in perell of euerlastyng dethe þat heryth prechyng and doth not
þerafter. Þerfor the Scriptur seith, [“Non in omni solo pane vivit homo,
sed in omni verbo quod procedit de ore Dei.”][323]
LI.
Gouerne thou thi tong aftir Saturne;
Late not evill theryn long soiorne.
To speke to mech it is a fowle custome,
And grete foly þerin is to presume.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account