The Escorial: A Historical and Descriptive Account of the Spanish Royal Palace, Monastery and Mausoleum — John Shaqi
The Escorial: A Historical and Descriptive Account of the Spanish Royal Palace, Monastery and MausoleumCalvert, Albert Frederick
History
The Escorial: A Historical and Descriptive Account of the Spanish Royal Palace, Monastery and Mausoleum
Calvert, Albert Frederick
Escorial
About the year 1582 the king was seized with a distemper of an epidemic
character, and was so prostrated that he prepared himself for death, and
wrote his will. But his disorder, although dangerous, was not fatal,
though the queen, who was also attacked, died in this same year. She was
interred among other royal persons in the Escorial. The death of Philip
II. occurred in 1598. He was indisposed at Madrid, and desired to be at
once removed to his beloved Escorial. So severe was his illness that it
was necessary to bear him thither slowly in a litter. Six days were
spent in conveying the stricken monarch over the eight leagues from
Madrid to the palace among the Guadarrama Mountains.
For fifty days the king lay in suffering. It was his wish to see every
part of the building before he died, and he was borne slowly through the
palace, the church, the convent, and the college. Philip was patient and
resigned in the contemplation of the last hour of his life. He evinced
his zeal in piety to the end, and ordered the release of certain
prisoners as a final act of mercy. When death approached, the king asked
that the prince and Isabella might attend at his bedside, and to them he
exhorted holiness, and spoke of the vanity of ambition and the
insecurity of power. On September 13 Philip II. partook of the last
sacrament, and passed away.
So died the Founder of the Escorial, and the initiator of the great work
which the Spanish people claimed as one of the chief wonders of the
world. He had lived to see the realisation of his desire. Year by year
he had watched the development of his plans, the building of the
monastery, the uplifting of the church, and the establishment of a court
and a college in this remote Castilian highland. The hours of his
retirement had been devoted to the gratification of his taste in the
arts, to contemplation, and to penance. Like Solomon, he had surrounded
himself with objects of priceless worth, and he passed his days in an
atmosphere of beauty. Æsthetic, and at the same time ascetic, Philip
seemed possessed of a dual nature in which rival forces constantly
contended. If his mind was marked by gloom, it was relieved by his
passion for art and by his love of the simple pleasures of a country
life. Nor was the king apparently devoid of a capacity for enjoying
occasionally the conventional gaieties of life, for among his numerous
retinue, he maintained a fool, or royal jester, one Miguel D’Antona, a
grotesque dwarf, with an ugly, humorous countenance.
The Escorial was a royal hobby. But for us it is something more, for it
illustrates in divers ways the thought, fancy, and idiosyncrasy of an
enigmatic personality. And more than this, the building instructs us in
the temper of a memorable age, profound in faith, zealous in patriotism,
and conspicuous in martial valour. An inspection of the Escorial is as
the reading of a long and remarkable chapter in the history of Spain.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account