The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh EatingWilliams, Howard
Philosophy
The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh Eating
Williams, Howard
Diet; Vegetarianism
In 1675, appeared his _Terra: a Discourse of the Earth Relating to the
Culture and the Improvement of it, to Vegetation and the Propagation
of Plants_. The book by which he is most popularly known is his _Diary
and Correspondence_, one of the most interesting productions of the
kind. Besides its value as giving an insight into the manner of life
in the fashionable society of the greater part of the seventeenth
century, it is of importance as an independent chronicle of the public
events of the day. The work which has the most interest and value for
us is his _Acetaria_ (Salads, or Herbs eaten with vinegar), in which
the author professes his faith in the truth and excellence of the
Vegetarian diet. Unfortunately, according to the usual perversity of
literary enterprise, it is one of those few books which, representing
some profounder truth, are nevertheless the most neglected by those who
undertake to supply the mental and moral needs of the reading public.
Evelyn held many high posts under the varying Governments of the day;
and being, by tradition and connexion, attached to the monarchical
party, he attracted (contrary to the general experience) the grateful
recognition of the restored dynasty.
Having adduced other arguments for abstinence from flesh, Evelyn
continues:--
“And now, after all we have advanced in favour of the herbaceous
diet, there still emerges another inquiry, viz., whether the use of
crude herbs and plants is so wholesome as is alleged? What opinion
the prince of physicians had of them we shall see hereafter; as
also what the sacred records of olden times seem to infer, before
there were any flesh-shambles in the world; together with the
reports of such as are often conversant among many nations and
people, who, to this day, living on herbs and roots, arrive to
an incredible age in constant health and vigour, which, whether
attributable to the air and climate, custom, constitution, &c.,
should be inquired into.”
Cardan--the pseudo-savant of the sixteenth century--had written, it
seems, in favour of flesh-meat. Evelyn informs us that:--
“This, [the alleged superiority of flesh] his learned antagonist,
utterly denies. Whole nations--flesh devourers, such as the
farthest northern--become heavy, dull, inactive, and much more
stupid than the southern; and such as feed more on plants are more
acute, subtle, and of deeper penetration. Witness the Chaldeans,
Assyrians, Egyptians, &c. And he further argues from the short
lives of most carnivorous animals, compared with grass feeders, and
the ruminating kind, as the Hart, Camel, and the longævus Elephant,
and other feeders on roots and vegetables.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account