The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh EatingWilliams, Howard
Philosophy
The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh Eating
Williams, Howard
Diet; Vegetarianism
“Of whom Hermippus, in his second book on the legislators, writes:
Of his laws, according to Xenokrates the philosopher, the three
following remain in force at Eleusis--‘to gratify Heaven with
the offering of fruits,’ ‘to harass or harm no [innocent] living
being.’ ... As to the third, he is in doubt for what particular
reason Triptolemus charged them to abstain--whether from believing
it to be criminal to kill those that have an identical origin with
ourselves (ὁμογενὲς), or from a consciousness that the slaughter
of all the most useful animals would be the inevitable consequence
of addiction to it, and wishing to render human life mild and
innocent, and to preserve those species that are tame and gentle
and domesticated with man.”[88]
* * * * *
Somewhat later than Porphyry, the name of Julian (331-363), the
Roman emperor, may here be fitly introduced. During his brief reign
of sixteen months he proved himself, if not always a judicious, yet a
sincere and earnest reformer of abuses of various kinds, and he may
claim to be one of the very few virtuous princes, pagan or christian.
Unfortunately the just blame attaching to his ill-judged attempt to
suppress the religion of Constantine, from whose family his relatives
and himself had suffered the greatest injury and insult, has enabled
the lovers of party rather than of truth successfully to conceal from
view his undoubted merits.
In his manner of living, with which alone we are now concerned, he
seems to have almost rivalled the most ascetic of the Platonists
or of the Christian anchorets. One of his most intimate friends,
the celebrated orator, Libanius, who had often shared the frugal
simplicity of his table, has remarked that his “light and sparing diet,
which was usually of the vegetable kind, left his mind and body always
free and active for the various and important business of an author,
a pontiff, a magistrate, a general, and a prince.” That his _frugal_
diet had not impaired his powers, either physical or mental, may
sufficiently appear from the fact that--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account