The Ethics of Medical Homicide and Mutilation — John Shaqi
The Ethics of Medical Homicide and MutilationO'Malley, Austin
Religion
The Ethics of Medical Homicide and Mutilation
O'Malley, Austin
Medical ethics
Existence, no matter how sordid, is immeasurably better than
non-existence, for non-existence is nothing; and when we consider
eternal life after separation from the body, even as a probability,
that raises existence to infinite possibilities above the void
of non-existence. A human life, even in an Australian Bushman,
in a tuberculous pauper, in the vilest criminal, is in itself so
stupendously noble a thing that the whole universe exists for its
upholding toward betterment. The raising of human life toward a
higher condition has been the sole tendency of all the magnificent
charity, sacrifice, patriotism, and heroism the best men and women of
the world since time began have striven in. The necessary first cause
itself is life, and life is by far the most sacred thing possible for
the first cause to effect. Eternal life is the greatest reward of the
just.
It is not permissible under any possible circumstance _directly_ to
kill an innocent human being. By killing directly is meant either (1)
as an end desirable in itself, as when a man is killed for revenge;
or (2) as a means to an end. By an innocent human being is meant
a person who has not by any voluntary act of his own done harm
commensurate with the loss of his own life.
To kill a human being is to destroy human nature, by separating the
vital principle from the body; to destroy anything is to subordinate
and sacrifice that thing absolutely to the purposes of the slayer;
but (1) no one has a right so to subordinate another human being,
because man and his life are solely under the dominion of God. If
a man may not kill himself, as we proved above, because he is not
master of his own life, he surely may not kill another to whom he is
no more closely related as master than he is to himself. (2) No man
has a right to subordinate another human being as is done in slaying
him, because this other human being is a person, an intelligent
nature, and consequently free, independent, referring its operations
solely to itself as to their centre. This very freedom differentiates
man from brutes and inanimate things. These are not independent;
they are rightly possessed by man; but man may be possessed by no
one except God. Even extrinsic human slavery is abhorrent to us as a
corollary of the intrinsic freedom of man, which is absolute. This
intrinsic freedom is such that we may not under any circumstances
lawfully resign it to another's possession. This is one of the chief
moral objections to oath-bound secret societies which exact blind
obedience. All morality depends on that freedom, all peace in life,
all civilization, and society itself.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account