The Ethics of Medical Homicide and MutilationO'Malley, Austin
Religion
The Ethics of Medical Homicide and Mutilation
O'Malley, Austin
Medical ethics
The end of our struggles, toil, fortitude, temperance, thrift, is
freedom,--freedom to do and to hold, freedom from the thraldom of
vice and barbarity. The rational endeavor of every civilized nation
is that it be free; and this means solely that every citizen thereof,
from the highest to the lowest, is made secure in his rights as a
human being. It intends that justice should prevail. Nearly all the
unhappiness, crime, moral misery, and much of the physical misery in
the world are due to a disregard for liberty, for the safeguarding
of men in their inalienable rights. Give every man his bare rights
as a man and all troubles of capital and labor, all race problems
would cease, the prisons would be empty, war would be unknown. Our
struggle toward justice, toward the protection of the rights of man,
toward liberty, must go on, or anarchy and social destruction will
ensue. Now, as there is nothing greater and nobler than liberty, the
freedom of the sons of God to do what they have a right to do, and as
every human being has a right to that liberty, so there is nothing
baser than its contrary, the destruction of that liberty; and no
destruction is so final as that of killing the man, no usurpation
so abhorrent to human nature and all liberty. Abhorrence for such
a destruction is the primal instinct of all human beings; even the
irrational reflexes of our bodies react quickest in protecting us
from that destruction.
Justice and order must prevail; that is a fundamental natural law
to which all other laws are subordinate. Justice, moreover, is a
moral equation, and whenever one right transcends another it must be
superior to the right it holds in abeyance. The right an innocent
human being has to his life, however, is so great that no other human
right can be superior to it while he remains innocent. Subversion
of this right by creatures is intrinsically evil, as blasphemy and
perjury are evil, although not in exactly the same degree.
There are occasions upon which it is permissible to kill,
_indirectly_, innocent persons. An effect is brought about indirectly
when it is neither intended as an end for its own sake, nor chosen as
means toward an end, but is attached as a circumstance to the end or
the means. Means help to an end, circumstances often do not, although
they may affect the morality of an act.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account