The evolution of general ideasRibot, Th. (Théodule)
Science
The evolution of general ideas
Ribot, Th. (Théodule)
Abstraction; Imagination
To conclude, their mental feebleness, known since the days of antiquity
by Aristotle, by the Roman law which dispossessed them of part of their
civil rights, later on by many philosophers who refused even to concede
them memory, arises from their inaptitude to transcend the inferior
forms of abstraction and kindred operations. In regard to the events
of ordinary life, in the domain of the concrete (admitting, as is not
always done, that there are individual varieties, some being intelligent,
and others stupid), deaf-mutes are sufficiently apt to seize and to
comprehend the practical connexion between complex things.[33] But the
world of higher concepts, moral, religious, cosmological, is closed to
them. Observations to this effect are abundant, though here again—as must
be insisted on—they reveal great individual differences.
Thus, a deaf-mute whose friends had tried to inculcate in him a few
religious notions, believed before he came under instruction that the
Bible was a book that had been printed in heaven by workmen of Herculean
strength. This was the sole interpretation he gave to the gestures of his
parents, who endeavored to make him understand that the Bible contains
a revelation, coming from an all-powerful God who is in heaven.[34]
Another who was taken regularly to church on Sunday, and exhibited
exemplary piety, only recognised in this ceremony an act of obedience
to the clergy. There are many similar cases on record. Others on the
contrary, seek to inquire into, and to penetrate, the nature of things.
W. James[35] has published the autobiography of two deaf-mutes who became
professors, one at the asylum of Washington, the other in California.
The principal interest attaching to the first is the spontaneous
appearance of the moral sense. After stealing small sums of money from
the till of a merchant, he accidentally took a gold coin. Although
ignorant of its value, he was seized with scruples, feeling “that it was
not for a poor man like him, and that he had stolen _too much_.” He got
rid of it as best he could, and never began again.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account