Anatomy, Comparative; Embryology, Human; Evolution; Human beings -- Origin
On this firm foundation provided by Remak for _histogeny,_ or the
science of the formation of the tissues, our knowledge has been
gradually built up and enlarged in detail. There have been several
attempts to restrict and even destroy Remak’s principles. The two
anatomists, Reichert (of Berlin) and Wilhelm His (of Leipzic),
especially, have endeavoured in their works to introduce a new
conception of the embryonic development of the vertebrate, according to
which the two primary germinal layers would not be the sole sources of
formation. But these efforts were so seriously marred by ignorance of
comparative anatomy, an imperfect acquaintance with ontogenesis, and a
complete neglect of phylogenesis, that they could not have more than a
passing success. We can only explain how these curious attacks of
Reichert and His came to be regarded for a time as advances by the
general lack of discrimination and of grasp of the true object of
embryology.
Wilhelm His published, in 1868, his extensive Researches into the
_Earliest Form of the Vertebrate Body,_[9] one of the curiosities of
embryological literature. The author imagines that he can build a
“mechanical theory of embryonic development” by merely giving an exact
description of the embryology of the chick, without any regard to
comparative anatomy and phylogeny, and thus falls into an error that is
almost without parallel in the history of biological literature. As the
final result of his laborious investigations, His tells us “that a
comparatively simple law of growth is the one essential thing in the
first development. Every formation, whether it consist in cleavage of
layers, or folding, or complete division, is a consequence of this
fundamental law.” Unfortunately, he does not explain what this “law of
growth” is; just as other opponents of the theory of selection, who
would put in its place a great “law of evolution,” omit to tell us
anything about the nature of this. Nevertheless, it is quite clear from
His’s works that he imagines constructive Nature to be a sort of
skilful tailor. The ingenious operator succeeds in bringing into
existence, by “evolution,” all the various forms of living things by
cutting up in different ways the germinal layers, bending and folding,
tugging and splitting, and so on.
[9] None of His’s works have been translated into English.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account