Anatomy, Comparative; Embryology, Human; Evolution; Human beings -- Origin
Plasm: the colloid or jelly-like matter of which organisms are
composed; hence:—
Caryoplasm: the matter of the nucleus (_caryon_).
Cytoplasm: the matter of the body of the cell.
Deutoplasm: secondary or differentiated plasm.
Metaplasm: secondary or differentiated plasm.
Protoplasm: primitive or undifferentiated plasm.
Plasson: the simplest form of plasm.
Plastidules: small particles of plasm.
Polyspermism: the penetration of more than one sperm-cell into the
ovum.
Pro- or Prot: (in compounds) the earlier form (opposed to Meta);
hence:—
Prochorion: the first form of the chorion.
Progaster: the first or primitive stomach.
Pronephridia: the earlier form of the kidneys.
Prorenal: the earlier form of the kidneys.
Prostoma: the first or primitive mouth.
Protists: the earliest or unicellular organisms.
Provertebræ: the earliest phase of the vertebræ.
Protophyta: the primitive or unicellular plants.
Protoplasm: undifferentiated plasm.
Protozoa: the primitive or unicellular animals.
Renal: pertaining to the kidneys (_renes_).
Scatulation: packing or boxing-up (_scatula_ = a box).
Sclerotomes: segments into which the primitive skeleton falls.
Soma: the body; hence:—
Cytosoma: the body of the cell (_cytos_).
Episoma: the upper or back-half of the embryonic body.
Somites: segments of the embryonic body.
Hyposoma: the under or belly-half of the embryonic body.
Teleology: the belief in design and purpose (_telos_) in nature.
Telolecithal: see Lecith-.
Umbilical: pertaining to the navel (_umbilicus_).
Vitelline: pertaining to the yelk (_vitellus_).
PREFACE
[BY JOSEPH MCCABE]
The work which we now place within the reach of every reader of the
English tongue is one of the finest productions of its distinguished
author. The first edition appeared in 1874. At that time the conviction
of man’s natural evolution was even less advanced in Germany than in
England, and the work raised a storm of controversy.
Theologians—forgetting the commonest facts of our individual
development—spoke with the most profound disdain of the theory that a
Luther or a Goethe could be the outcome of development from a tiny
speck of protoplasm. The work, one of the most distinguished of them
said, was “a fleck of shame on the escutcheon of Germany.” To-day its
conclusion is accepted by influential clerics, such as the Dean of
Westminster, and by almost every biologist and anthropologist of
distinction in Europe. Evolution is not a laboriously reached
conclusion, but a guiding truth, in biological literature to-day.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account