The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to EinsteinD'Abro, A. (Aram)
Science
The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to Einstein
D'Abro, A. (Aram)
Relativity (Physics); Science -- Methodology
IN this chapter we shall be concerned solely with manifolds and their
dimensionality; and not with their metrics, which pertains to a
different problem entirely.
We all possess a certain instinctive understanding of what is meant by
continuity. We notice, for example, that sounds, colours or tactual
sensations merge by insensible gradations into other sounds, colours
or tactual sensations, without any abrupt transitions. An aggregate
of such continuous sensations constitutes what is called a sensory
continuum or continuous manifold. That continuity is a concept
which springs from experience can scarcely be doubted, and it can be
accounted for by the inability of our crude senses to differentiate
between impressions which are almost alike.
Consider, for example, the succession of musical notes exhibited in
the chromatic scale on the piano. Here we are not in the presence of
a sensory continuum, for the successive sounds do not merge into one
another by insensible degrees. Even an untrained ear can differentiate
between a and the -sharp immediately following it. But we
can conceive of a piano in which a sufficient number of semitones
and intermediary notes have been interposed so that every note would
be indistinguishable from its immediate successor and immediate
predecessor, although we should still be able to differentiate between
non-contiguous notes. It would thus be possible for us to pass through
a continuous chain of sounds from any one musical sound to any other
without our ear’s ever being able to detect a sudden jump; and this
is what we mean by calling our aggregate of sounds a sensory
continuum.
Suppose now that we were to remove any one of these notes from our
piano (excluding the two extreme ones). The continuity of our chain
of sounds would be broken, for when we reached the missing note we
should detect a sudden variation in pitch as we passed from the sound
immediately preceding the removed note to the one immediately following
it. In short, the removal of one of the notes would cut our continuous
chain of sounds in two.
[Pg 24]
The dimensionality of our continuum of sounds is obviously unity, for
we can assign successive numbers to the successive notes, starting from
some standard note, and by this means determine them without ambiguity.
Let us complicate matters somewhat by assuming that every individual
note may be sounded with various intensities, but always in such a way
that a note of given intensity can never be distinguished from the
one sounded just a little louder or just a little softer. Once again
it will be possible for us to pass in a continuous way from a note
of feeble intensity to the same note sounded with louder intensity,
without our ear’s ever being able to detect a variation in intensity
between two successive sounds. More generally we shall be able to pass
in a continuous way from a note of given pitch and given intensity to
one of some other pitch and some other intensity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account