The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to EinsteinD'Abro, A. (Aram)
Science
The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to Einstein
D'Abro, A. (Aram)
Relativity (Physics); Science -- Methodology
In the case assumed we should be dealing with a two-dimensional
continuum or continuous manifold of sounds; for in order to locate a
definite sound it would be necessary for us to designate it by two
numbers, one specifying its pitch and the other its intensity. We may
also notice that whereas in the first case, by removing one of the
notes, we were able to cut the manifold of successive pitches into
two parts, the removal of one particular note of definite pitch and
intensity will now be incapable of effecting this separation.
For instance, if we were to remove the note sounded with a
definite intensity it would still be possible to pass in a continuous
way from any one note of given intensity to any other note of our
continuum by circumscribing the missing note; namely, by choosing
some route of transfer which would pass through a differing in
intensity from that of the we had removed.
In the present case, if we wished to divide our two-dimensional
manifold into two parts, it would be necessary to remove some
one-dimensional continuum of sounds, for example the one-dimensional
continuum formed by all the notes of a given pitch , but varying
in intensity, or again of given intensity but varying in pitch. If
this were done, it would be impossible for us to pass in a continuous
way from a note of definite pitch and intensity of our two-dimensional
continuum to a note of any other definite pitch and intensity; for
we could never get past the removed line of sounds without our ear’s
detecting a sudden change.
We might complicate matters still further by taking into consideration
variations in tonality, as for instance the variation which our ear can
detect between two given notes of the same pitch and intensity sounded
by two different instruments, such as a violin and an organ. Assuming
that every one of our notes of given pitch and intensity in our
two-dimensional manifold could also vary in tonality by imperceptible
degrees, we should be dealing with a three-dimensional sensory
continuum in which every note of given pitch, intensity and tonality
could be defined unambiguously by the choice of three numbers.
As before, we should find that the removal of a single note of given
pitch, intensity and tonality, or even the removal of a one-dimensional
continuum of notes such as all those of given intensity and pitch, but
varying in tonality, was quite insufficient to effect a separation in
our three-dimensional manifold. In the present case we should have
[Pg 25]
to remove some two-dimensional continuum—say, all notes of given
intensity but varying in pitch and tonality. Only then should we have
effected a separation between any given element and any other one,
rendering it impossible for a continuity of sound impressions to extend
between the two elements. By proceeding in this way indefinitely it
is obvious that we can conceive of sensory continua of any number of
dimensions; there is no need to limit ourselves to three.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account