The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to EinsteinD'Abro, A. (Aram)
Science
The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to Einstein
D'Abro, A. (Aram)
Relativity (Physics); Science -- Methodology
245
XXIV. THE POSTULATE OF EQUIVALENCE
250
XXV. THE INCLUSION OF GRAVITATION IN
THE MODEL OF SPACE-TIME
261
XXVI. TENSORS AND THE LAWS OF NATURE
266
XXVII. THE PRINCIPLE OF GENERAL
COVARIANCE, OR THE GENERAL PRINCIPLE OF
RELATIVITY
276
XXVIII. THE DISCOVERY OF THE EINSTEINIAN
LAW OF GRAVITATION
281
XXIX. THE GENERAL LAWS OF MOTION
286
XXX. THE VERIFICATION OF EINSTEIN’S LAW
290
XXXI. THE SEPARATION OF SPACE-TIME INTO
SPACE AND TIME IN A GRAVITATIONAL FIELD
293
XXXII. THE PRINCIPLES OF CONSERVATION
305
XXXIII. OTHER ASPECTS OF THE GRAVITATIONAL
EQUATIONS
310
XXXIV. THE FINITENESS OF THE UNIVERSE
313
XXXV. THE IMPORTANCE OF SPACE-TIME, AND
THE PRINCIPLE OF ACTION
347
XXXVI. THE MYSTERY OF MATTER
356
XXXVII. THE THEORIES OF WEYL AND EDDINGTON
360
PART IV
THE METHODOLOGY OF SCIENCE
XXXVIII. THE METHODOLOGY OF SCIENCE
373
XXXIX. THE CO-ORDINATION OF PHYSICAL FACTS
ACCOMPLISHED BY RELATIVITY
474
XL. THE GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE THEORY OF
RELATIVITY
481
APPENDICES
I. THE SPACE AND TIME GRAPHS
509
II. THE CURVATURES OF SPACE-TIME
524
III. THE GRAVITATIONAL EQUATIONS
527
IV. SPACE, GRAVITATION AND SPACE-TIME
531
[Pg ix]
FOREWORD
“And now, in our time, there has been unloosed a cataclysm which has
swept away space, time and matter, hitherto regarded as the firmest
pillars of natural science, but only to make place for a view of things
of wider scope, and entailing a deeper vision.”
H. WEYL (“Space, Time and Matter”).
THE theory of relativity represents the greatest advance in our
understanding of nature that philosophy has yet witnessed.
If our interest is purely philosophical, we may wish to be informed
briefly of the nature of Einstein’s conclusions so as to examine their
bearing on the prevalent philosophical ideas of our time. Unfortunately
for this simplified method of approach, it is scarcely feasible.
The conclusions themselves involve highly technical notions and, if
explained in a loose, unscientific way, are likely to convey a totally
wrong impression. But even assuming that this first difficulty could
be overcome, we should find that Einstein’s conclusions were of so
revolutionary a nature, entailing the abandonment of our ideas on
space, time and matter, that their acceptance might constitute too
great a strain on our credulity. Either we would reject the theory
altogether as a gigantic hoax, or else we should have to accept it on
authority, and in this case conceive it in a very vague and obscure way.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account