The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to EinsteinD'Abro, A. (Aram)
Science
The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to Einstein
D'Abro, A. (Aram)
Relativity (Physics); Science -- Methodology
From a perusal of the numerous books that have been written on the
subject by a number of contemporary philosophers, the writer is firmly
convinced that the only way to approach the theory, even if our
interest be purely philosophical, is to study the scientific problem
from the beginning. And by the beginning we refer not to Einstein’s
initial paper published in 1905; we must go back much farther, to
the days of Maxwell and even of Newton. Here we may mention that
however revolutionary the theory of relativity may appear in its
philosophical implications, it is a direct product of the scientific
method, conducted in the same spirit as that which inspired Newton
and Maxwell; no new metaphysics is involved. Indeed Einstein’s theory
constitutes but a refinement of classical science; it could never have
arisen in the absence of that vast accumulation of mathematical and
physical knowledge which had been gathered more especially since the
days of Galileo. Under the circumstances it is quite impossible to gain
a correct impression of the disclosures of relativity unless we first
acquaint ourselves with the discoveries of classical science prior to
Einstein’s time. It will therefore be the aim of this book, before
discussing Einstein’s theory proper, to set forth as simply as possible
this necessary preliminary information.
Modern science, exclusive of geometry, is a comparatively recent
creation and can be said to have originated with Galileo and Newton.
[Pg x]
Galileo was the first scientist to recognise clearly that the only
way to further our understanding of the physical world was to resort
to experiment. However obvious Galileo’s contention may appear in the
light of our present knowledge, it remains a fact that the Greeks, in
spite of their proficiency in geometry, never seem to have realised,
the importance of experiment (Democritus and Archimedes excepted).
To a certain extent this may be attributed to the crudeness of their
instruments of measurement. Still, an excuse of this sort can scarcely
be put forward when the elementary nature of Galileo’s experiments and
observations is recalled. Watching a lamp oscillate in the cathedral
of Milan, dropping bodies from the leaning tower of Pisa, rolling
balls down inclined planes, noticing the magnifying effect of water in
a spherical glass vase, such was the nature of Galileo’s experiments
and observations. As can be seen, they might just as well have been
performed by the Greeks. At any rate, it was thanks to such experiments
that Galileo discovered the fundamental law of dynamics, according to
which the acceleration imparted to a body is proportional to the force
acting upon it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account