The Evolution of StatesRobertson, J. M. (John Mackinnon)
History
The Evolution of States
Robertson, J. M. (John Mackinnon)
Europe -- Politics and government; Great Britain -- Politics and government; Political science -- History
Eduard Meyer (_Geschichte des Alterthums_, ii, 511) decides for the
view of L. Lange, that the historic appellation of Roman citizens,
_Quirites_, derives from _curia_. The ancients had several theories
as to the name. One (Festus) was that the Sabine goddess Curis gave
her name to the Sabine town Cures (cp. Athenê, Athenai), whence,
according to the legend, had come a band under Titus Tatius, who
conquered the Capitoline and Quirinal hills, and had for tribe-god
Quirinus. Cp. Ihne, _Early Rome_, p. 82. Mommsen (Eng. tr. 1862, i,
57, 78, _notes_) has secured currency for the other tradition,
argued for by F.W. Newman (_Regal Rome_, 1852, pp. 55-56), that the
root is the Sabine word _curis, quiris_, a spear. For this somewhat
unplausible theory there is support in the fact that in the cognate
Gaelic _coir_, pronounced quîr, means a spear, and that there is
derived thence _curiadh_, a warrior. Mommsen is followed by
Merivale, _General History of Rome_, 5th ed. p. 13; and Greenidge,
_Roman Public Life_, p. 33. Pott and Becker, who derived _Quirites_
from _curia_, explain the latter word as _co-viria_, the band of
warriors. And as the view that "Athenê" comes from "Athenai," not
_vice versâ_, has the stronger claims to acceptance, the more
acceptable presumption is that "Curis" and Quirinus evolved from
the _curia_. If _Quirites_ meant spearmen, how could Cæsar be
understood to cow mutineers by simply addressing them as Quirites
[= citizens]? The curia theory is supported by the facts that "the
Roman constitutional tradition ... makes the division into curies
alone originate with the origin of the city"; that it "appears as
an essential part of the Latin municipal system;" and that of all
the old divisions it seems to be the only one that "really
fulfilled important functions in the primitive constitutional
organisation" (Mommsen, B. i, ch. v, pp. 73-75).
These _curiæ_ may be conceived as derived from inner tribal or clan
groups formed in the conquering stage, since they are ostensibly united
by their collective or curial _sacra_, the rites for which the grouped
_gentes_--who each have their private _sacra_--assemble in a special
place, under a special priest. They still retain the usage of a common
banquet,[17] the earliest form of collective religion known to us.[18]
Apart from the members of the _curiæ_ are the conquered _plebs_,[19]
"the many" not enslaved, but payers of tribute; without share in the
_curiæ_ or vote in the _comitia_, or assembly, and without part in the
curial or other _sacra_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account