The Expositor's Bible: The Book of NumbersWatson, Robert A. (Robert Alexander)
Religion
The Expositor's Bible: The Book of Numbers
Watson, Robert A. (Robert Alexander)
Bible. Numbers -- Commentaries
The picture of the great organised camp and orderly march of Israel
is interesting; but it presents a contrast to the disorganised,
disorderly condition of human society in every land and every age.
While it may be said that there are nations leagued in creed, allied
by descent, which form the van; that others, similarly connected more
or less, constitute the right and left wings of the advancing host;
and the rest, straggling far behind, bring up the rear--this is but
a very imaginative representation of the fact. No people advances as
with one mind and one heart; no group of nations can be said to have a
single standard. Time and destiny urge on the host, and all is to be
won by steady resolute endeavour. Yet some are encamped, while others
are moving about restlessly or engaged in petty conflicts that have
nothing to do with moral gain. There should be unity; but one division
is embroiled with another, tribe crosses swords with tribe. The truth
is that as Israel came far short of real spiritual organisation and due
disposition of its forces to serve a common end, so it is still with
the human race. Nor do the schemes that are occasionally tried to some
extent promise a remedy for our disorder. For the symbol of our most
holy faith is not set in the midst by most of those who aim at social
organisation, nor do they dream of seeking a better country, that is, a
heavenly. The description of the camp of Israel has something to teach
us still. Without the Divine law there is no progress, without a Divine
rallying-point there is no unity. Faith must control, the standard of
Christianity must show the way; otherwise the nations will only wander
aimlessly, and fight and die in the desert.
III
_PRIESTS AND LEVITES_
1. THE PRIESTHOOD
NUMBERS iii. 1-10
In the opening verse of this chapter, which relates to the designation
of the priesthood, Moses is named, for once, after his brother.
According to the genealogy of Exod. vi., Aaron was the elder; and this
may have led to the selection of his as the priestly house--which
again would give him priority in a passage relating to the hierarchy.
If Moses had chosen, his undoubted claims would have secured the
priestly office for his family. But he did not desire this; and indeed
the duties of administrative head of the people were sufficiently
heavy. Aaron was apparently fitted for the sacerdotal office, and
without peculiar qualifications for any other. He seems to have had no
originating power, but to have been ready to fall in with and direct
the routine of ceremonial worship. And we may assume that Moses knew
the surviving sons of Aaron to be of the stamp of their father, likely
to inaugurate a race of steady, devoted servants of the altar.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account