The Expositor's Bible: The Book of Numbers — John Shaqi
The Expositor's Bible: The Book of NumbersWatson, Robert A. (Robert Alexander)
Religion
The Expositor's Bible: The Book of Numbers
Watson, Robert A. (Robert Alexander)
Bible. Numbers -- Commentaries
Yet all Aaron's sons had not been of this quiet disposition. Nadab
and Abihu, the two eldest, had sinned presumptuously, and brought on
themselves the doom of death. No fewer than five times is their fall
referred to in the books of Leviticus and Numbers. Whatever that
strange fire was which they put in their censers and used before the
Lord, the judgment that befell them was signal and impressive. And
here reference is made to the fact that they died without issue, as
if to mark the barrenness of the sacrilegious. Did it not appear that
inherent disqualification for the priesthood, the moral blindness or
self-will which was shown in their presumptuous act, had been foreseen
by God, who wrote them childless in His book? This race must not be
continued. Israel must not begin with priests who desecrate the altar.
Whether the death of those two sons of Aaron came by an unexpected
stroke, or was a doom inflicted after judgment in which their
father had to acquiesce, the terrible event left a most effectual
warning. The order appointed for the incense offering, and all
other sacred duties, would thenceforth be rigidly observed. And the
incident--revived continually for the priests when they studied the
Law--must have had especial significance through their knowledge of
the use and meaning of fire in idolatrous worship. The temptation
was often felt, against which the fate of Nadab and Abihu set every
priest on his guard, to mingle the supposed virtue of other religious
symbols with the sanctities of Jehovah. Who can doubt that priests
of Israel, secretly tempted by the rites of sun-worship, might have
gone the length of carrying the fire of Baal into Jehovah's temple,
if the memory of this doom had not held back the hand? Here also the
degradation of the burnt offering by taking flame from a common fire
was by implication forbidden. The source of that which is the symbol
of Divine purity must be sacredly pure.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account