The express companies of the United States : $b a study of a public utilityBenedict, Bertram
History
The express companies of the United States : $b a study of a public utility
Benedict, Bertram
Express service -- United States; Parcel post -- United States
_Ratio_
_Average_ _Average_ _Freight_
_Freight_ _Express_ _Charges_
_Charge_ _Charge_ _to Express_
_Country_ _Date_ _Per Ton_ _Per Ton_ _Charges_
Argentina 1909 $1.95 $6.51 1 to 3.2
Austria 1908 .74 3.77 1 to 5
Belgium 1909 .53 4.92 1 to 9.3
France 1908 .95 6.88 1 to 7.2
Germany 1908 .76 3.80 1 to 5
Hungary 1908 .93 3.68 1 to 3.9
United States 1909 1.90 31.20 1 to 16.4
And yet the statesmen at Washington have disposed and doubtless will
still endeavor to dispose of the proposal to have the Government own and
manage the express service of the land by speeches on texts to the
effect that the spirit of America demands individual freedom; that that
is the best Government which governs the least; that incentive to
productive endeavor is possible only in private establishments and
completely disappears in the public service; to which will now doubtless
be added the charge that such a proposal smacks of Socialism and that
every red-blooded American understands that anything and everything
Socialistic is undeniably un-American!
The implication of the above figures, however, is undeniable for the man
who trusts thought as well as emotions. The Postal System has gone into
the express field and, in competition with the express companies, by
their respective showings, has in five years rendered to the American
public far more valuable service than that rendered by the express
companies. The opponents of Government ownership and management have
been ruthlessly confuted. They predicted graft--there has been none.
They prophesized inefficiency--the figures give them the lie. They
foretold unwholesome political intrusions--whatever may be the
unwholesome features of the present operations of our postal system,
those operations are less unwholesomely attached to political influences
than ever before. There is accordingly every reason _a priori_ to assume
that the Government would render more valuable service than that
rendered by the express companies in the remaining section of the
express field unoccupied by it and still occupied only by the express
companies.
But there is no necessity for relying upon _a priori_ reasoning. The
results to be achieved by the consolidation of the express service of
the land into the postal system of the land are definite and
demonstrable.
EXPRESS SERVICE VS. PARCEL-POST
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account