Do not misunderstand what I mean by this. I am not advocating that
anyone should swallow the bacteria of deadly diseases, such as typhoid
and cholera; I am not advocating that anyone should use food which
is in a state of decomposition--on the contrary, I have ruled out of
my dietary a number of foods in common use which depend for their
production upon bacterial action; for instance, beer and wine, and
all alcoholic drinks, all kinds of cheeses, sauerkraut, vinegar, etc.
My point is simply that the ordinary healthy person has no reason for
terrifying himself about the common aërobic bacteria--which swarm
in the atmosphere, and are found by hundreds of millions in all raw
food, and in cooked food which has not been kept with the elaborate
precautions that a surgeon uses with his instruments and linen; also
that the real problem is to take into the system those foods which can
be readily digested and assimilated, and which afford the body all the
elements that it needs to keep itself in the best condition for the
inevitable, incessant warfare with the hostile organisms which surround
it.
So far as meat is concerned, of course no sensible person would use
meat which showed the slightest trace of being spoiled, nor any meat
which had been canned, or ground up and made into messes, such as
sausage. If one uses reasonably fresh meat, the bacteria which may
be on the outside of it will be killed by proper cooking. And so the
question is, it seems to me, what does meat do after it gets into the
stomach? And that is a matter for practical experiment, which very few
people have made, so far as I have any information. Innumerable people
are eating meat, of course; but they are eating it in combination with
all other kinds of destructive foods, and they are eating it prepared
in innumerable unwholesome ways. So far as I know, no scientist has
ever taken a group of normal men and kept them for a certain period
upon a rational vegetarian diet, and then put them for another period
upon a diet containing broiled fresh meat, and made a thoroughly
scientific study of their condition, as, for instance, Professor
Chittenden did for his "low proteid" experiments.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account