The Florist and Horticultural Journal, Vol. II. No. 7, July, 1853: A Monthly Magazine of Horticulture, Agriculture, Botany, Agricultural Chemistry, Entomology, &c. — John Shaqi
The Florist and Horticultural Journal, Vol. II. No. 7, July, 1853: A Monthly Magazine of Horticulture, Agriculture, Botany, Agricultural Chemistry, Entomology, &c.Various
History
The Florist and Horticultural Journal, Vol. II. No. 7, July, 1853: A Monthly Magazine of Horticulture, Agriculture, Botany, Agricultural Chemistry, Entomology, &c.
MR. EDITOR:—Who among horticulturists has not heard of the
“Strawberry Question”—has not wondered at the opposite opinions
held by eminent cultivators, and perhaps like myself has
been surprised that the spirit of inquiry has not been more
generally diffused concerning a subject of so much importance.
Is it because our instructors cannot come to a unanimous
conclusion upon it, that we pupils in horticulture have been
doubtful about expressing our opinions upon it, or have we
never studied the subject for ourselves but left them in their
wisdom to decide it for us? I was in this position waiting for
their decision, but as it was not likely to be forthcoming, I
resolved to study the subject for myself, have done so this
season, and will give you my experience in connection with the
“Strawberry Question.”
The points of difference between a staminate and pistillate
strawberry flower are so marked that a very casual observer
cannot fail to notice them at once, for in staminate varieties
the flowers are lax, the sepals of the calyx appear alternately
with the petals of the corolla, the stamens occupy the most
prominent place in the flower, rising half their length above
the central pistils, are very much swelled at the base, and
very large compared with the other parts of the flower, anthers
broadly heart shaped, large, and producing abundance of pollen.
Pistils, loose, long, and having a barren appearance, which is
soon proved by their withering away, and leaving the stamens
masters of the field. The embryo receptacle when it does
exist at all is very much flattened, and in the most of cases
cannot be said to exist at all, the pistils being inserted in
the thickened cup of the calyx. All flowers that have this
appearance in these varieties, very soon wither away and leave
this impression on the mind of the observer, that they were
surely staminate varieties. But as all staminate varieties do
not thus wither away, but many of them produce fruit, it may be
asked are the flowers all the same in appearance. It is here
where the peculiarities in this class are met with, for there
are few but what produce some fruit, and as real staminate
flowers could not produce this fruit, it would readily be seen
that staminate varieties produce two sorts of flowers; the
one where the organs are unequally balanced which produce no
fruit, the other where the flowers are perfect and are fruit
bearing. The appearance of the flower that will produce fruit
is markedly different from the other—by the shortness of the
stamens, the conical shaped receptacle, the pistils stiff and
thickly set thereon. The flower is altogether more compact, and
is as perfect in its organs as any of the Alpine varieties. The
following sorts have proved staminate with me.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account