The foreign debt of English literatureTucker, T. G. (Thomas George)
History
The foreign debt of English literature
Tucker, T. G. (Thomas George)
Comparative literature; English literature -- History and criticism
At length, thanks to the efforts of Lorenzo the Magnificent, Poliziano
and Pulci at Florence, and of Boiardo at Ferrara, there was a revival
of Italian letters, a new breath of spontaneity passing over literary
creation. There is no need to speak in detail of the sonnets and
_canzoni_ of Lorenzo de’ Medici, modelled on Petrarch and addressed to
a Lucrezia Donato as the counterpart of Laura, nor of the lyric grace
and descriptive beauty of the learned and tasteful Poliziano. But of
Pulci’s romantic epic of _Morgante Maggiore_ and Boiardo’s _Orlando
Innamorato_ it is necessary to say a word, for the reason that they are
the precursors of Ariosto’s _Orlando Furioso_, of Tasso’s _Jerusalem
Delivered_, and thence indirectly of Spenser’s _Faerie Queene_. It is
Ariosto and Tasso who rank next to Dante, Petrarch, and Boccaccio, and
who consummate that sixteenth century or “Cinque Cento” literature which
constitutes the silver epoch of Italian letters. Pulci’s _Morgante
Maggiore_ and Boiardo’s _Orlando Innamorato_ are both “chivalrous
romances,” written in the _ottava rima_, or Italian equivalent of the
Spenserian stanza. They are not exactly epics, but rather stories of
knightly adventures, full of description and of the marvellous, of the
romance of love and arms, full of knights who slay giants, liberate
ladies, and fall in love with pagan maidens. Pulci’s work, though often
sufficiently earnest and stirring, is also often seasoned with that
mocking humour, that irony, that refusal to take ideals seriously, which
is one of the most constant of Italian characteristics. That of Boiardo
is of a more serious type. These books, as has just been hinted, mark a
revival of the well-known French romances, of the adventures credited to
the Paladins of Charlemagne. Such stories, which have no foundation in
sober history, were early borrowed by the Italians, and everyone knew of
Charlemagne, of Roland and Oliver, of the disaster of Roncesvalles, of
the traitor Gano and the rest. It was for Pulci and Boiardo to take these
legends of romance from the people, give them a literary shape, and so
lead the way for the magnificent work of Ariosto. It may be mentioned
in passing that Boiardo’s Moorish hero Rodamonte, the insolent and
atheistic—a name utilized by Ariosto in the form Rodomonte—has supplied a
term for that species of bombastic romancing which we call “rodomontade.”
That Boiardo was read by Milton is clear from allusion in _Paradise
Regained_.
In the next generation the _Orlando Innamorato_ was recast by Berni into
a mocking and satirical form, which was much more to the taste of the
Italian mind. The language of this _rifacimento_ is marked by greater
ease and polish than the original, but its chief claim to distinction
lies in the peculiar humour of the writer—the “Bernesque”—of interest
to students of English literature, from the fact that Berni largely
determined the character of the great productions of Byron’s Italian
period.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account