New England -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775
The attempt to erect the moral opinion of a minority into a legal code
binding upon all was not, by any means, confined to that section alone
at the beginning of the seventeenth century. It was, and is, a
characteristic of Puritanism wherever found. At the very time that
Bradford was condemning the Christmas sports of Plymouth, the
authorities in Bermuda, for example, were passing laws requiring that
there should be haled to court all “Sabath breakers” who were such “by
absenting themselves from church, or leaving during service,” or “by
using any bodily recreation by gaminge, sportinge, or by doing any
servile work as travelling, fyshinge, cuttinge of wood, digginge of
potatoes, carryinge of burdens, beatinge of corne,” together with a long
list of other misdemeanors. New England Sabbatarian legislation never
went further. Even that petty spying upon one another, to detect sins to
be reported to the church, which must have been such an unpleasant form
of keeping one's brother in New England, was by no means indigenous
there. The “churchwardens and sydesmen,” continued the Bermudian law,
“shall dailie observe the carriage and lives of the people, and shall
forthwith informe the ministers of all such scandalous crymes as shall
be comitted by any of them.”[255] Such quotations from the statute books
of the other colonies could be multiplied almost indefinitely.
Footnote 255:
J. H. Lefroy, _Memorials of the Discovery and Early Settlements of the
Bermudas_ (London, 1877-79), vol. II, p. 320.
The Puritan seed was sown on many soils, and if it took root and
flourished so abundantly in New England as there to crowd out the
flowers of the field to a greater extent than elsewhere, it was due in
part to the nature of the actual soil which the Puritan himself had to
till. We have already noted how the geographical features of the region
fostered the classes of fishermen, small traders, subsistence farmers,
and townsmen; how it prevented the growth of a large land-owning or
slave-owning population; how, in a word, it produced a society which was
largely democratic and almost wholly middle-class. Moreover, in the
discussion of Puritanism, we noticed how that movement was strongest,
struck its roots deepest, and assumed its most uncompromising form, in
the very class which thus became almost synonymous with the New England
population.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account