New England -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775
J. C. Ballagh, “The Land System in the South,” in _American Historical
Association Report_, 1897, p. 109.
When the land was first settled, it was everywhere covered by a dense
forest, except for meadows here and there, along the shore or in the
larger river-bottoms. Even to-day, of the thirty thousand square miles
of land-surface in Maine, the forest is said to extend over twenty-one
thousand, a district as large as New Hampshire, Massachusetts, and
Connecticut combined.[11] These forests, mainly of hard-wood, deciduous
trees, with an admixture of conifers in Maine, had been practically
untouched by the natives, except by burning the underbrush. In fact,
Whitney claims that more trees had been destroyed by the beavers than by
the Indians.[12] Although building stone is plentiful in New England,
this abundance of timber along the Atlantic coast determined the form of
the colonial architecture, and developed a type of wooden building
little used in England. It also provided the materials for
ship-building, the forests growing to the very edge of a shore indented
almost everywhere by suitable harbors; and, in the early period, this
industry is found scattered along the entire shore. But it tended to
concentrate at fewer points, as the lumber-supply near at hand became
exhausted, and the tonnage of vessels increased. “In reading the early
commercial history of New England,” however, as Miss Semple well says,
“one seems never to get away from the sound of the ship-builder's
hammer, and the rush of the launching vessel.”[13]
Footnote 11:
H. A. Pressey, _Water-Powers of the State of Maine_; U. S. Geological
Survey, 1902, p. 15.
Footnote 12:
J. D. Whitney, _The United States_ (Boston, 1889), p. 176.
Footnote 13:
E. C. Semple, _American History and its Geographic Conditions_
(Boston, 1903), p. 122.
The climate, though varying in intensity from northern Maine and New
Hampshire to southern Connecticut, and also from inland to the sea, is,
on the whole, a severe one. Snow falls to a considerable depth
everywhere, remaining in the mountains till late in the spring, the
lower mean temperature of the year, as compared with the coast farther
south, being due to the greater cold of winter rather than to a cooler
summer. The seasonal changes, indeed, are very marked, and the cultural
influence of “the harshness of contrasts and extremes of sensibility,”
of a “winter which was always the effort to live,” and a summer which
was “tropical license,” must formerly have been even greater than
to-day.[14] A noteworthy feature of our Atlantic coast, climatically, is
the crowding together of the isothermal lines, so that the frigid and
tropical zones are brought within twenty degrees of latitude, as
compared with forty in Europe. This bringing the products of so many
climatic regions comparatively near to one another greatly stimulated
intercolonial trade, which New England early claimed the largest share
in carrying.[15]
Footnote 14:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account