New England -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775
Meanwhile, Mrs. Hutchinson had won over practically all the Boston
church, except Wilson, Winthrop, and a few others, who, however, were
strong enough to defeat the proposal to install Wheelwright as
teacher.[404] The strife was gradually spreading, and Vane, who had
allied himself with the Hutchinson party, made a flimsy excuse to resign
the governorship. The Boston church and the Court both refused to
consider his reasons valid, and the resignation was withdrawn. A
conference of the ministers, called by the Court, was held in December,
to try to compose the differences, but accomplished nothing except to
increase the bitter feeling between the parties. A day of fasting was
proclaimed, and although Wheelwright had removed to Mt. Wollaston, he
attended the Boston church on that occasion, and preached his famous
“fast-day sermon.”[405] For expressions contained in it, as falsely
interpreted by the authorities, he was declared by the Court to have
been guilty of contempt and sedition, the same body condemning Stephen
Greensmith to a fine of £40 for saying that all the ministers, except
Cotton, Wheelwright, and, possibly, Hooker, taught a covenant of
works.[406]
Footnote 404:
_Ibid._, vol. I, pp. 241 _ff._
Footnote 405:
It is reprinted by C. H. Bell, _John Wheelwright_ (Prince Society,
Boston, 1876), pp. 153 _ff._
Footnote 406:
_Massachusetts Records_, vol. I, p. 189.
Wheelwright having next been summoned to appear before the General
Court, a petition was presented, signed by nearly all the members of the
Boston church, asking that the hearings should be open to freemen, and
that cases of conscience might be first dealt with by the churches.[407]
This was declared to be “a groundless and presumptuous act.”
Wheelwright's examination was begun in private, and the authorities
stated that it would proceed _ex officio_. This raised loud complaints
among the people, who avowed that it was but one of those High
Commission proceedings which they had left England to escape.
Wheelwright refused to answer the questions put, and the hearings were
finally allowed to be open. The clergy were then asked by the Court
whether they did teach a covenant of works. All but Cotton replied in
the affirmative, and the verdict was thus foreshadowed. Nevertheless, it
took two days of further struggling, again behind closed doors, before
the sentence of sedition and contempt could be agreed to, and the party
of the priests and magistrates secure their victory.[408] A petition,
denying that any of Wheelwright's utterances had been seditious, was
presented to the Court, signed by sixty members of the Boston church,
for which they were rebuked by Winthrop.[409]
Footnote 407:
J. Winthrop, _History_, vol. I, p. 256.
Footnote 408:
Adams, _Three Episodes_, vol. I, pp. 444 _f._
Footnote 409:
Adams, _Antinomianism_, pp. 133 _ff._; Winthrop, _History_, vol. I,
pp. 183 _f._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account