New England -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775
The majority of the Court, however, evidently feared the next election,
and secured the passage of a resolution requiring that the elections
should be held at Newtown, and not, as had always been customary, at
Boston.[410] At the election, in May, Vane and Winthrop were the
opposing leaders, and although the former attempted some ill-judged
political manœuvres, the ecclesiastical party was wholly successful.
Winthrop was elected governor, Dudley deputy—governor, and Endicott,
apparently as a reward for his share in the proceedings, was made a
member of the unconstitutional life council, while all the Boston
Antinomians were defeated for the magistracy. When, in answer to this,
that town next day returned Vane, Coddington, and Hoffe as deputies, the
Court “found a means to send them home again,” claiming that two of the
Boston freemen had not been notified of the election. The next morning,
Boston held a new election, and returned the same deputies, and “the
court not finding how they might reject them, they were admitted.”[411]
Footnote 410:
_Massachusetts Records_, vol. I, p. 191.
Footnote 411:
_Ibid._, vol. I, pp. 195 _ff._; J. Winthrop, _History_, vol. I, pp.
261 _ff._
The victory over Boston, however, was evidently not considered
sufficient, and the Court proceeded to pass an immigration law, to the
effect that no town could receive any person for a longer time than
three weeks without permission of one of the council or two of the
magistrates. In other words, no Englishman could settle in Massachusetts
without personal permission from Winthrop, Dudley, or Endicott, or two
of their eight associates. The law had evidently been framed to prevent
any accession to the ranks of the Hutchinson party, and was promptly put
into execution on the arrival of a considerable body of newcomers,
including a brother of Mrs. Hutchinson, who were forced to leave the
colony after having reached its shores.[412] Feeling naturally ran high,
and Winthrop defended, while Vane attacked, the validity and justice of
such an enactment.[413] With the law already alluded to, placing the
whole control of the franchise in the hands of the magistrates and the
clergy, and with this new law, which gave the right of admission to the
colony wholly to the former, the control of the oligarchy would seem to
have been fairly complete.
Footnote 412:
_Ibid._, p. 278.
Footnote 413:
The documents are given in the Hutchinson _Papers_, vol. I, pp.
79-114.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account