New England -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775
The several attempts to plant forcibly on the Delaware were successfully
repulsed by the two nations already in possession there; and in 1646,
Kieft sent a protest to the New Haven magistrates against their settling
on the Housatonic. To this they replied that they could not imagine what
river the Dutch could mean, and unfairly offered to leave any dispute to
the English Parliament as arbitrators; while at the New Haven court, “it
was fully and satisfyeingly voted” that they would make good their
titles “at the trading house, and leave the issue of things to
God.”[570]
Footnote 570:
_New Haven Records_, vol. I, pp. 265 _f._ The Dutch spoke of the river
as the Mauritius. In their reply, the New Haven people stated that
they had built on the Paugusset “within our owne lymitts.”
Contentions, new and old, dragged along, embittering relations, and
filling a very large portion of the United Colonies' time and records.
Finally, after Stuyvesant had been governor for three years, he went to
Hartford to try to arrange an amicable settlement of all outstanding
grievances between the colonies of the two nations. The negotiations
were carried on in writing; and both then and in subsequent
correspondence, it must be confessed that, in dignity and courtesy, the
Dutch Governor shone by comparison with the English Commissioners. His
tone throughout was statesmanlike and dignified, while that of the
Puritans was frequently low, and, at times, insulting.
It was finally decided that each side should appoint two deputies to
negotiate a treaty, and Stuyvesant nominated, as his, two Englishmen,
then resident in the Dutch colony.[571] As a result of their
deliberations, a treaty was signed, in September, 1650, which should
have set the disputed matters finally at rest.[572] Most of the smaller
questions were passed over, while that of the Delaware was referred to
Europe. The explanation of the Dutch Governor as to a ship seized at New
Haven, some years earlier, was accepted as final,[573] and a definite
boundary line agreed upon, which gave to the English all territory,
except Fort Good Hope, lying eastward of Oyster Bay on Long Island and
of a line beginning four miles west of Greenwich on the mainland, and
running north, provided it came nowhere within ten miles of the Hudson.
Greenwich, also, was to remain to the Dutch, who were otherwise not to
build within six miles of the new boundary, which was to be referred to
England and Holland for ratification. Holland subsequently accepted
it,[574] but England never acted, as to have done so would have been to
recognize Dutch claims as valid, which she persistently refused to do.
Footnote 571:
_Acts United Colonies_, vol. I, pp. 186 _f._
Footnote 572:
_Ibid._, pp. 188 _ff._
Footnote 573:
_New Haven Records_, vol. I, pp. 333, 508; _Acts United Colonies_,
vol. I, pp. 112, 146.
Footnote 574:
_N. Y. Col. Docts._, vol. II, pp. 258 _f._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account