New England -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775
Voyaging toward the northwest, in the hope of finding the treasures of
the East, had possibly been undertaken annually from 1491, by certain
citizens of Bristol, England, when the Italian, John Cabot, domiciled in
their city, applied to King Henry VII for letters patent “for the
discovery of new and unknown lands.” The Cabots themselves left no
account of their voyages, and the story must be made up from a few
contemporary documents, some hearsay evidence, and a large amount of
inference. Apparently, John Cabot sailed, some time in 1497, under the
patent granted to himself and his sons, and by the end of August was
back in England, after a voyage of several months. The location of the
landfall, made June 24, is wholly uncertain.[48] A second voyage was
made the following year, and a considerable part of the northeast coast
appears to have been explored, although it is impossible to place the
limits of the discovery. Whether he was accompanied on either or both of
the voyages by his son Sebastian is uncertain, but it is probable that
he was.[49] As for the rest, one is tempted to echo Dawson's remark,
that “as for John Cabot, Sebastian says he died, which is one of the few
undisputed facts in the discussion.”[50] To us, the importance of the
voyage lies in the fact that upon it England based her claims, in later
times, to a portion of the New World, though she made no effort to
colonize for another eighty years, and the immediate effect of the
discovery was not great—The times were not yet ripe. Exploration and
land-grabbing were games for kings, and not for private endeavor, as the
merchants of Bristol had doubtless found; and Henry, as the Milanese
ambassador observed, was “not lavish.”
Footnote 48:
Prowse favors Newfoundland; d'Avezac, Deane, Réclus, Winsor, Brevoort,
Eggleston, Winship, Biggar, and Dawson believe in Cape Breton; Biddle,
Humboldt, Kohl, Stevens, Kretschmer, and Harrisse point to Labrador.
The question is not important, and the alignment is given merely to
show the uncertainties of this and other early voyages. The original
sources are most accessible to the general reader in C. R. Beazley,
_John and Sebastian Cabot_; London, 1898.
Footnote 49:
In regard to the 1497 voyage, opinion ranges from R. Biddle, _Memoir
of Sebastian Cabot_ (Philadelphia, 1831), p. 50, who doubts if the
father went, to H. Harrisse, _John Cabot_ (London, 1896), p. 48, who
doubts if the son did!
Footnote 50:
S. E. Dawson, “Voyages of the Cabots.” _Transactions of the Royal
Society of Canada_, Series II, 1894, p. 53.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account