The "free press" : $b portrait of a monopoly — John Shaqi
The "free press" : $b portrait of a monopolyMarion, George
History
The "free press" : $b portrait of a monopoly
Marion, George
Press -- United States
A borderline area was the Saar Valley, the Palatinate and Rhenish
Prussia. The French Government wanted that for Havas. Reuters was
neither wholly unwilling nor enthusiastic, because Britain wanted a
moderately strong Germany to act as a check on France. Finally, and
subject to the Saar Plebiscite 15 years later, “they made a compromise
by which Wolff Agency might serve there, but a copy of Wolff service
should go to the Havas Agency, and if it was not satisfactory Wolff
could be removed from there.”
The victors were not averse to tearing slices of territory from one
another, either, so within the winning combination some changes were
made. Havas retained the bulk of the Balkans, but Greece and Turkey
passed “into Reuters’ [Britain’s] sphere of influence.”
Battle for Asia
A.P. remained a stepchild during all this time. It obtained a free hand
in South America, as already related. But in general, just as Great
Britain was slow to recognize and acknowledge the unmistakably superior
position of the rival American imperialism, so Reuters took a haughty
tone toward A.P. requests for adjustments in their relations. Outside
the cartel, accordingly, A.P. built up positions and alliances for an
ultimate showdown. Inside A.P., Kent Cooper gathered allies for his
more aggressive program against the still dominant go-slow policy of
Melville Stone.
While Britain was deeply involved in World War I, the U.S.
greatly extended the American communications network. Monopoly in
communications was deliberately fostered to “advance the national
interests.” This process, begun during World War I and continued
through World War II, is described in the previously-cited _Report
on Freedom of the Press_.[B] As this study is financed by a _Time_
magazine grant and has semi-governmental, semi-official news industry
standing, it is not critical of imperialist expansion. All the more
weight must be attached to its admission that State and industry are
one in communications and news-export.
These new government-fostered monopolies now played an important part
in the forward march of American news. Though A.P. had refused to do a
propaganda-job under government control, it was not at all reluctant to
let the government pay for A.P.’s expansion. This is what happened:
The Far East was the scene of the first open clash with Reuters.
Reuters’ absolute domination of world news produced some peculiar
effects on American-Oriental information exchange. West Coast
publishers, led by Hearst, were frantic about the situation. Cooper’s
first ally within A.P. was V. J. McClatchy, California publisher who
reflected the violent anti-British, anti-Japanese policies of Hearst.
McClatchy, in turn, won the support of Adolph Ochs, publisher of the
most powerful newspaper in America--the _New York Times_. A.P. was now
consciously but cautiously working toward an ultimate showdown with
Reuters.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account