The "free press" : $b portrait of a monopoly — John Shaqi
The "free press" : $b portrait of a monopolyMarion, George
History
The "free press" : $b portrait of a monopoly
Marion, George
Press -- United States
It was on the strength of this tremendously favorable competitive
position that A.P. laid down the gauntlet to Reuters in 1932. It
demanded “free competition.” Meaning that Japan, for instance, must be
free to switch from Reuters to A.P. service. All American monopolies
tend to demand “free competition” because they are now in a position to
strangle their isolated competitors. Nourished by a huge home market
built up with plenty of government aid, they no longer need direct
subsidy and want to establish a no-subsidy rule for younger and weaker
national news industries. The newspaper industry is in an even stronger
position than chemicals, steel and other monopolies. In no other
country has news-publishing grown into a business of comparable size
and power. In no other country does the newspaper business stand so
near the top in the list of Big Businesses.
A.P. understood this very well. Reuters misunderstood it badly. For
years it held out stoutly against A.P.’s right--verbally admitted but
never put in writing--to operate in Japan. Jones was confident that
A.P. would never risk a break with Reuters; he counted on the threat
that Reuters would take U.P. into the cartel if A.P. walked out. Cooper
deliberately led Jones into a trap, pretending eagerness to maintain
the alliance but needling him at all points.
“While I wondered how long it would be before this bubble of Reuters
world domination would burst, I was willing for Sir Roderick to blow
his own bubble so big that it would burst through his own exertion but
I would not puncture it myself,” Cooper gloats.
It burst in 1934. Carrying his pretense of humility and loyalty to the
uttermost limits, Cooper travelled from Japan to London to explain to
Sir Roderick that A.P.’s activities in Japan were within the meaning
of the contract. Pretending to mollify Jones, he encouraged him to
think that his own actions were due to weakness either of A.P. or of
his position within A.P. Accordingly, Jones refused to sanction the
A.P.-Rengo deal. He announced that the cartel agreement must be renewed
on the old terms or Reuters would allow it to lapse.
Reuters had fallen into a trap. Not only A.P., but the American news
monopoly as a whole was determined to humble the British. United
Press joined A.P. in an agreement establishing between themselves the
principle of “non-exclusive access to foreign news at its source.” This
meant that U.P. would not agree to replace A.P. in the European cartel.
So A.P. blandly notified Reuters that it “agreed” to let the “alliance”
lapse.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account