Free thought; Modernism (Christian theology) -- Catholic Church; Religion and science; Teaching, Freedom of
“It is my unyielding conviction,” so speaks _A. Harnack_, and his
is perhaps the most telling expression of this dogmatic mood,
“that anything that happens within time and space is subject to
the laws of motion. Hence, that in this sense, _i.e._, of
interrupting the natural connection, there cannot be any
miracles.” One simply does not believe such things. “That a
tempest at sea,” thus _Harnack_ again, “could have been stilled by
a word we do not believe, nor shall we ever again believe it.”
Similarly reads _Baumgarten’s_ declaration regarding the
resurrection of Christ: “Even if all the reports had been written
on the third day, and had been transmitted to us as a certainty
... nevertheless modern consciousness could not accept the story.”
And _W. Foerster_ writes: “The supposition that such interferences
do not occur, and that everything in the world is advancing
steadily and in accordance with fixed laws, forms the
indispensable presumption of scientific research.” And _H. von
Sybel_ holds “An absolute concord with the laws of evolution, a
common level in the existence of things terrestrial, forms the
presumption of all knowledge: it stands and falls with it.”
This is the presumption, from which is drawn the most extravagant
conclusion, which, though so manifestly improper, is made the basis for
rejecting the entire supernatural religion of Christianity. Because God’s
Incarnate Son, in a small town of Palestine, once turned water into wine,
will the Christian housewife lose her confidence in the stability of
water? When it was suddenly discovered that the orbit of the planet Uranus
was not a perfect ellipsis, as required by the law of _Kepler_, was it
thought that these deviations are impossible because there must not be any
exception to the law of perfect elliptical movements? Happily, this law
continued to be accepted without deeming an irregularity impossible, and
shortly afterwards Neptune was discovered and found to be the cause of the
disturbance. But anything miraculous, no matter how well proven, must be
considered unacceptable by reason of such unsound presumption.
Philosophical a-priorism is superior to facts.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account