The freedom of the seas : $b or, The right which belongs to the Dutch to take part in the East Indian trade — John Shaqi
The freedom of the seas : $b or, The right which belongs to the Dutch to take part in the East Indian tradeGrotius, Hugo
Philosophy
The freedom of the seas : $b or, The right which belongs to the Dutch to take part in the East Indian trade
Grotius, Hugo
Freedom of the seas; Law of the sea
which they had been robbed in the name of religion should be
restored. This policy is said to have received the approval of Pope
Paul III, and of Emperor Charles V, King of the Spains.
I pass over the fact that the Portuguese in most places do not
further the extension of the faith, or indeed, pay any attention to
it at all, since they are alive only to the acquisition of wealth.
Nay, the very thing that is true of them, is the very thing which has
been written of the Spaniards in America by a Spaniard, namely, that
nothing is heard of miracles or wonders or examples of devout and
religious life such as might convert others to the same faith, but on
the other hand no end of scandals, of crimes, of impious deeds.
Wherefore, since both possession and a title of possession are
lacking, and since the property and the sovereignty of the East
Indies ought not to be considered as if they had previously been
_res nullius_, and since, as they belong to the East Indians, they
could not have been acquired legally by other persons, it follows
that the East Indian nations in question are not the chattels of the
Portuguese, but are free men and _sui juris_. This is not denied even
by the Spanish jurists themselves.[43]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CAPUT V
_Mare ad Indos aut ius eo navigandi non esse proprium Lusitanorum
titulo occupationis_
Si ergo in populos terrasque et diciones Lusitani ius nullum
quaesiverunt, videamus an mare et navigationem, aut mercaturam
sui iuris facere potuerint. De mari autem prima sit consideratio,
quod cum passim in iure aut nullius, aut commune, aut publicum
iuris gentium dicatur, hae voces quid significent ita commodissime
explicabitur, si Poetas ab Hesiodo omnes, et Philosophos; et
Iurisconsultos veteres imitati in tempora distinguamus, ea, quae
tempore forte haud longo, certa tamen ratione, et sui natura discreta
sunt. Neque nobis vitio verti debet si in iuris a natura procedentis
explicatione auctoritate et verbis eorum utimur quos constat naturali
iudicio plurimum valuisse.
Sciendum est igitur in primordiis vitae humanae aliud quam nunc est
dominium, aliud communionem fuisse.[44a] Nam dominium nunc proprium
quid significat, quod scilicet ita est alicuius ut alterius non sit
eodem modo. Commune autem dicimus, cuius proprietas inter plures
consortio
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CHAPTER V
_Neither the Indian Ocean nor the right of navigation thereon belongs
to the Portuguese by title of occupation_
If therefore the Portuguese have acquired no legal right over the
nations of the East Indies, and their territory and sovereignty,
let us consider whether they have been able to obtain exclusive
jurisdiction over the sea and its navigation or over trade. Let us
first consider the case of the sea.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account