The freedom of the seas : $b or, The right which belongs to the Dutch to take part in the East Indian tradeGrotius, Hugo
Philosophy
The freedom of the seas : $b or, The right which belongs to the Dutch to take part in the East Indian trade
Grotius, Hugo
Freedom of the seas; Law of the sea
Haec igitur sunt illa quae Romani vocant communia omnium iure
naturali[71a] aut quod idem esse diximus, publica iurisgentium, sicut
et usum eorum modo communem, modo publicum vocant. Quamquam vero
etiam ea nullius esse, quod ad proprietatem attinet, recte dicantur,
multum tamen differunt ab his quae nullius sunt, et communi usui
attributa non sunt, ut ferae, pisces, aves; nam ista si quis occupet,
in ius proprium transire possunt, illa vero totius humanitatis
consensu proprietati in perpetuum excepta sunt propter usum, qui cum
sit omnium, non magis omnibus ab uno eripi potest, quam a te mihi
quod meum est. Hoc est quod Cicero dicit inter prima esse Iustitiae
munera, rebus communibus pro communibus uti. Scholastici dicerent
esse communia alia affirmative, alia privative. Distinctio haec non
modo Iurisprudentibus usitata est, sed vulgi etiam confessionem
exprimit; unde apud Athenaeum convivator mare commune esse dicit, at
pisces capientium fieri. Et in Plautina Rudente servo dicenti,[72a]
‘Mare quidem commune certost omnibus’, assentit piscator, addenti
autem, ‘In mari inventust communi’ recte occurrit:
_Meum quod rete atque hami nancti sunt, meum potissimumst._
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
the sea for those who are being tossed upon it, the shore for those
who have been cast thereon’. Vergil also says that the air, the sea,
and the shore are open to all men.
These things therefore are what the Romans call ‘common’ to all men
by natural law,[71] or as we have said, ‘public’ according to the
law of nations; and indeed they call their use sometimes common,
sometimes public. Nevertheless, although those things are with reason
said to be _res nullius_, so far as private ownership is concerned,
still they differ very much from those things which, though also _res
nullius_, have not been marked out for common use, such for example
as wild animals, fish, and birds. For if any one seizes those things
and assumes possession of them, they can become objects of private
ownership, but the things in the former category by the consensus
of opinion of all mankind are forever exempt from such private
ownership on account of their susceptibility to universal use; and
as they belong to all they cannot be taken away from all by any one
person any more than what is mine can be taken away from me by you.
And Cicero says that one of the first gifts of Justice is the use
of common property for common benefit. The Scholastics would define
one of these categories as common in an affirmative, the other in a
privative sense. This distinction is not only familiar to jurists,
but it also expresses the popular belief. In Athenaeus for instance
the host is made to say that the sea is the common property of all,
but that fish are the private property of him who catches them. And
in Plautus’ Rudens when the slave says:[72] ‘The sea is certainly
common to all persons’, the fisherman agrees; but when the slave
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account