France -- History -- Louis XVI, 1774-1793; France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799
How such Ideals do realise themselves; and grow, wondrously, from
amid the incongruous ever-fluctuating chaos of the Actual: this
is what World-History, if it teach any thing, has to teach us,
How they grow; and, after long stormy growth, bloom out mature,
supreme; then quickly (for the blossom is brief) fall into decay;
sorrowfully dwindle; and crumble down, or rush down, noisily or
noiselessly disappearing. The blossom is so brief; as of some
centennial Cactus-flower, which after a century of waiting shines
out for hours! Thus from the day when rough Clovis, in the Champ
de Mars, in sight of his whole army, had to cleave retributively
the head of that rough Frank, with sudden battleaxe, and the
fierce words, ‘It was thus thou clavest the vase’ (St. Remi’s and
mine) ‘at Soissons,’ forward to Louis the Grand and his _L’Etat
c’est moi_, we count some twelve hundred years: and now this the
very next Louis is dying, and so much dying with him!—Nay, thus
too, if Catholicism, with and against Feudalism (but _not_
against Nature and her bounty), gave us English a Shakspeare and
Era of Shakspeare, and so produced a blossom of Catholicism—it
was not till Catholicism itself, so far as Law could abolish it,
had been abolished here.
But of those decadent ages in which no Ideal either grows or
blossoms? When Belief and Loyalty have passed away, and only the
cant and false echo of them remains; and all Solemnity has become
Pageantry; and the Creed of persons in authority has become one
of two things: an Imbecility or a Macchiavelism? Alas, of these
ages World-History can take no notice; they have to become
compressed more and more, and finally suppressed in the Annals of
Mankind; blotted out as spurious,—which indeed they are. Hapless
ages: wherein, if ever in any, it is an unhappiness to be born.
To be born, and to learn only, by every tradition and example,
that God’s Universe is Belial’s and a Lie; and “the Supreme
Quack” the hierarch of men! In which mournfulest faith,
nevertheless, do we not see whole generations (two, and sometimes
even three successively) live, what they call living; and
vanish,—without chance of reappearance?
In such a decadent age, or one fast verging that way, had our
poor Louis been born. Grant also that if the French Kingship had
not, by course of Nature, long to live, he of all men was the man
to accelerate Nature. The Blossom of French Royalty, cactus-like,
has accordingly made an astonishing progress. In those Metz days,
it was still standing with all its petals, though bedimmed by
Orleans Regents and _Roué_ Ministers and Cardinals; but now, in
1774, we behold it bald, and the virtue nigh gone out of it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account