The Fruits of Victory: A Sequel to The Great Illusion — John Shaqi
The Fruits of Victory: A Sequel to The Great IllusionAngell, Norman
History
The Fruits of Victory: A Sequel to The Great Illusion
Angell, Norman
Economic history -- 1918-1945; World War, 1914-1918 -- Influence
M. Tardieu, who was M. Clemenceau's political lieutenant in the framing
of the Treaty, and one of the principal inspirers of the French policy,
writing in July, 1920, long after the condition of Europe and the
Continent's economic dependence on Germany had become visible, 'warns'
us of the 'danger' that Germany may recover unless the Treaty is applied
in all its rigour! He says:--
'Remember your own history and remember what the _rat de terre de
cousin_ which Great Britain regarded with such disdain after the
Treaty of Frankfurt became in less than forty years. We shall see
Germany recover economically, profiting by the ruins she has made
in other countries, with a rapidity which will astonish the world.
When that day arrives, if we have given way at Spa to the madness
of letting her off part of the debt that was born of her crime, no
courses will be too strong for the Governments which allowed
themselves to be duped. M. Clemenceau always said to British and
American statesmen: "We of France understand Germany better than
you." M. Clemenceau was right, and in bringing his colleagues round
to his point of view he did good work for the welfare of humanity.
If the work of last year is to be undone, the world will be
delivered up to the economic hegemony of Germany before twenty-five
years have passed. There could be no better proof than the recent
despatches of _The Times_ correspondent in Germany, which bear
witness to the fever of production which consumes Herr Stinnes and
his like. Such evidence is stronger than the biased statistics of
Mr Keynes. Those who refuse to take it into account will be the
criminals in the eyes of their respective countries.'[11]
Note M. Tardieu's argument. He fears the restoration of Germany
industry, _unless_ we make her pay the whole indemnity. That is to say,
in other words, if we compel Germany to produce during the next
twenty-five years something like ten thousand millions worth of wealth
_over and above her own needs_, involving as it must a far greater
output from her factories, mines, shipyards, laboratories, a far greater
development of her railways, ports, canals, a far greater efficiency and
capacity in her workers than has ever been known in the past, if that
takes place as it must if we are to get an indemnity on the French
scale, why, in that case, there will be no risk of Germany's making too
great an economic recovery!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account